You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should poor people be allowed to have pets? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 05:59 PM
Original message
Should poor people be allowed to have pets?
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Sat Sep-13-08 06:10 PM by oktoberain
If poor people cannot afford to do the following things, should they be banned from owning or caring for animals?

--Feed their pets a quality, preferably human-grade pet food.
--Buy the $40 FrontLine or Advantage flea treatment every 3-4 months for every animal that might get outside.
--Take their pet to the vet for shots, deworming, and all other "routine" care. (Not counting the rabies vaccine, which is both inexpensive and necessary for public safety.)
--Have money set aside to pay for emergency vet treatment in case of accident, illness, or injury.
--Get their pet spayed or neutered immediately.

Should the inability to do all (or even most) of these things legally disqualify someone from owning or caring for an animal? Should there be any exceptions--for example, people doing rescues of an animal that would otherwise starve? Furthermore, should the inability to do certain things for a pet be consider a form of animal cruelty? Just how far is "too far" when considering who's allowed to have pets and who is not?

What about people who CAN easily afford to do these things, but choose not to? Is it more a standard of caring "to the best of your ability" than a solid line in the sand? Where should the line be drawn when determining which things are absolutely necessary, if we were to have a legal standard for pet ownership in America?

The reason I ask is that I've seen a lot of mixed messages when it comes to this issue. It can be confusing, as well as morally arbitrary at times, and I think it's worth talking about. Understandably, this is a sensitive issue for a lot of people here, so it would be nice if we could do this without flaming each other to ashes.

Edit: People seem to be getting the wrong idea. I guess I tried *too* hard to be neutral. For the record, I am of the opinion that there should NOT be any kind of legal restriction on pet ownership, so long as the owner is not a hoarder or an abuser. I am a poor person who has been told by OTHERS that because I cannot afford to XYZ, I shouldn't be allowed to have pets. It hurt. I just wanted to see if this was something that a lot of people felt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC