You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don’t cut Social Security, DOUBLE It [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 04:54 PM
Original message
Don’t cut Social Security, DOUBLE It
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Thu Sep-02-10 04:58 PM by kpete
http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/secure_retirement_for_all_americans

Don’t cut Social Security, DOUBLE It

By Steven Hill

In the aftermath of the Great Recession, a debate over Social Security is heating up. This debate raises fundamental questions about the kind of society in which Americans wish to live. So far, the debate has been between deficit-busters who say Social Security must be trimmed back to reduce government indebtedness and others who want to maintain it as is.

But the New America Foundation just released a study http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/secure_retirement_for_all_americans that proposes a different approach: doubling the current Social Security payout, and making it a true national retirement system. Creating a more robust system of “Social Security Plus” not only would be good for American retirees, but also would be good for the greater macro economy.

...............

An expansion of Social Security — one of the most successful and popular social programs in American history, currently celebrating its 75th year — would be good for the macro-economy as well because it would act as an “automatic stabilizer” during economic downturns, keeping money in retirees’ pockets and stimulating consumer demand. Benefits would be portable when changing from one job to another.

It also would help American businesses trying to compete with foreign companies that don’t provide pensions to their employees, since those countries already have generous national retirement plans. And it would be broadly fair, since even those higher income Americans who are losing their tax deductions would see part of it returned to them in the form of a greater Social Security payout.

more:
http://firedoglake.com/2010/09/02/special-salon-steven-hill-dont-cut-social-security-double-it/

.............
Bingo.
And, I would point out, Social Security has turned out to be much more stable than any of the other “legs” of our three-legged retirement stool, i.e. company pensions and private savings/homeownership.
http://firedoglake.com/2010/09/02/special-salon-steven-hill-dont-cut-social-security-double-it/#comment-2209038
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/1a8a5cb2-9ab2-11df-87e6-00144feab49a.html
http://growth.newamerica.net/sites/newamerica.net/files/policydocs/FreedomFromFear.pdf
http://growth.newamerica.net/sites/newamerica.net/files/policydocs/Hill%20-%20Social%20Security%20-%2013-Aug-10%20-%20spaced%20graphs.pdf

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC