You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #121: Sorry. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Matsubara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #112
121. Sorry.
Sorry, but killing a terminally ill person out of mercy is not the same as a violent crime. And if the person who dies ASKED to be killed, the court does consider that.

And as for dollar amount the reason that matters is because it can be quantified OBJECTIVELY. The emotions motivating a crime cannot.

I didn't decide that there should be a difference between petty theft and grand larcey, but according to the law, there is.

The motive should not be relevant because it has not bearing on the damages to the victim and because it cannot be evaluated objectively by the jury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC