You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #6: That's called "Naderism"--worked well in 2000, didn't it? [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)

elocs

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Fri Jun-22-07 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #1

6. That's called "Naderism"--worked well in 2000, didn't it?

Anybody who is a Democrat or normally votes Democratic and does not vote for the Democratic candidate for president in 2008 can share the responsibility for what the Republican does if he wins. I will gladly take my share of responsibility for voting for the Democrat since whatever that person does will be much better than the Republican. Can anybody say "nominees to the Supreme Court"? Still think it makes no difference if there is a Republican elected in 2008?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.