Reply #67: You Can Criticize My Person All You Want. It Still Doesn't Overcome The Logic. [View All]

All I've done here is supplied fundamental logic and reasoning. I believe it to be indisputable in its merits. Not one response in this thread yet has shown why in the upcoming election the OP premise does not stand firm. When I see one, I will readily acknowledge it. I'm not going to just say "ok, I guess the logic is up for interpretation and not as bullet proof as I thought it was" just for sake of making you feel better. If you want me to acknowledge that, then you're going to have to show why the two logical points listed in the OP are false.

And I've listened to every reply and have not issued any sarcastic challenges. They are all legitimate and I welcome the answers to them all. If someone comes with even greater logic that stands even more firmly, I will readily acknowledge it. But I don't see how when broken down to its most basic form of fundamental logic, how it wouldn't in the end fit into one of the two categories listed. If you can show that to be in error, I welcome seeing how.