You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"If there are all these great safeguards in place, THEN WHERE ARE THE E-MAILS?" Blanton asked. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 11:23 AM
Original message
"If there are all these great safeguards in place, THEN WHERE ARE THE E-MAILS?" Blanton asked.
Advertisements [?]
Here's a meme we need to promote!

From the same LAT article about Bush\Cheney claiming they are not agencies in the Executive Branch.

<snip>

Several security experts said they were not aware that the president had exempted his own office from the oversight requirements. But they said it fit what they saw as a pattern in the administration of avoiding accountability, even on matters of national security.

"If the president and the vice president don't take their own rules seriously, who else should?" said Tom Blanton, director of the National Security Archive, a nongovernmental research institute at George Washington University in Washington that lobbies for open government.

"If they get a blank check, it's a recipe for disaster. I can't think of a quicker way to break down the credibility of the entire security-classification system."

Blanton noted that the White House had acknowledged that a substantial number of in-house e-mails had disappeared in recent years, at a time when investigators wanted to review them for possible evidence of inappropriate leaks of classified information.

"If there are all these great safeguards in place, then where are the e-mails?" Blanton asked.

Waxman, chairman of the powerful House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, wrote an eight-page letter to Cheney on Thursday in which he complained that the vice president had refused to adhere to the executive order. Waxman, citing the criminal investigation of Cheney's office related to the leak of a CIA agent's identity, suggested that the vice president's office was a national security risk.

<snip>

Link: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-cheney23jun23,0,7611803,print.story?coll=la-home-center

I think we need to push this very part of the story. If they are going to claim that they will take care of their own documents separately, then they have to be able to certify that they know how to handle classified documents on their own. Since they seem to "lose" or "misplace" tons of documents, maybe they need their security clearances revoked.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC