all three judges sound as if they feel like they had just dropped down the rabbit hole and knew it.
"Because they flunked highschool math doesn't mean a federal crime was committed." This was in response to some quibbling over the number of 'points' the bidders actually received; it sounded as if the prosecution extended the evaluation score to a larger number of decimal points to try to prove that the bidder coming in first was actually second.
I hope that she can sue them for malicious prosecution.
BTW, if I heard correctly, the statute number she was prosecuted under was '666'.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
