You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Things are about to get ugly on my Facebook page, re: Ridge, Bush and (believe it or not) Nixon [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
bbernardini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-20-09 12:26 PM
Original message
Things are about to get ugly on my Facebook page, re: Ridge, Bush and (believe it or not) Nixon
Advertisements [?]
Send me a friend request (at Brian Bernardini) if you want to get in on the fun. Some background:

This morning, I posted a link to the Tom Ridge story on thinkprogress. I got this response, from somebody who is my complete political opposite:

""was pushed to raise the security alert on the eve of President Bush’s re-election, something HE SAW as politically motivated and worth resigning over."

He saw. His perception. And it's from ThinkProgress. Please, Brian."


Another friend responded thusly (completely unrelated to the above post):

"Knowing that administration, it wouldn't suprise me. Boy, they must've really studied all of the Nixon administration's shenanigans leading up to the Watergate scandal to be able to pull the same crap without the whole getting caught part of it."


The first guy responded:

""Knowing that administration...." Yes, do tell."


The second came back with this (not at all comprehensive) list:

"Oh, where do I begin:

- How 'bout getting elected when the Republican-controlled Supreme Court halted any chance of any recount of votes in Florida?
- How 'bout deciding on going to war in Iraq without approval from Congress; something ANY President needs before declaring war?
- How 'bout the fact that, despite the fact Kerry and Howard Dean decided not to challenge it, the Diebold company, the ones who manufactured the polling machines used in the 2004 election, were known as a major contributor to the Bush campaign, thus were in a position to be suspect in the voting irregularities in that election?
- How 'bout the Vice-President's team leaking the name of a CIA informant just because her husband had the audacity to speak out against the adminitration's policies?
Wouldn't suprise me if political reasons were the motivation for the raising of the security alert. It would be the first real reason presented for all those security alerts they announced publicly."


I'm now awaiting a response from Guy #1. This always seems to happen on my Facebook page...I post something left-leaning, and then just step back and enjoy the argument. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC