Reply #42: I believe it [View All]

First and foremost, she's a disgusting completely self-involved human being. Secondly, she has the blindest ambition of just about anyone I've ever seen on the world political stage. A "retarded" baby is of no value to her and the faux family image she wished to create to sell herself to the masses. Thirdly, if it is indeed true that both of those babies are her grandchildren (which I am totally inclined to believe), it's makes a sick and twisted sort of sense that she would refer to the babies in such a detached and cold-blooded fashion. Her family only exists as a prop, and in the existence of both of those babies is a letdown for her. I have no problem believing that she would refer to them so cruelly and coldly. That woman is amongst the worst evil the GOP has ever unleashed. She is right up there with Dick Cheney in my book.