You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #104: Concur largely, dissent in part. "Not worthy to shine Frederick Douglass's boots" is absolutely [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #101
104. Concur largely, dissent in part. "Not worthy to shine Frederick Douglass's boots" is absolutely
correct, of course, as is the assessment that cause was .. one of the worst for which a people ever fought -- so it is entirely fitting that Arlington was seized for a burial ground

Lee's attitude towards slavery was contaminated by his own personal and class interests, much as Thomas Jefferson's was: like Jefferson, who agonized loudly about the morality of slavery but never really let that angst influence his own behavior, Lee was happy to write (1856) There are few, I believe, in this enlightened age, who will not acknowledge that slavery as an institution is a moral and political evil -- while simultaneously making every possible excuse for the institution and giving every possible rationalization for allowing it to wither away slowly rather than overthrowing it in a single decisive step. That a man who himself delayed the release of slaves manumitted by an estate of which he was the executor, in order to help him pay so debts, could also say at the end of the Civil War (according to biographer Nolan) I am rejoiced that Slavery is abolished is logically incongruous, of course, but I regard the sentiment as entirely sincere, however hypocritical it seems to us over a century later. None of this justifies Lee in my eyes: it simply sheds light on particular ways people of his era compromised their moral principals when facing practical consequences; such compromises, occurring on a great historical scale, predicably produced tragic results

The real point of my post, of course, was that Lee felt he owed primary allegiance to Virginia, not to the US, which seems to be a common attitude of the states rights crowd at the time of the Civil War

Robert E. Lee's Opinion Regarding Slavery
This letter was written by Lee in response to a speech given by then President Pierce.
Robert E. Lee letter dated December 27, 1856
http://www.civilwarhome.com/leepierce.htm
http://fair-use.org/robert-e-lee/letter-to-his-wife-on-slavery

<The Lee quote I am rejoiced that Slavery is abolished can be found in Nolan's book but here is an appearance on the web>
http://www.legendsofamerica.com/AH-CivilWarTimeline6.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC