You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #124: I'm Okay With a 14 Year Old Boy Having Consenual Sex With Whatever Woman He Wishes [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #112
124. I'm Okay With a 14 Year Old Boy Having Consenual Sex With Whatever Woman He Wishes
Consensual sex implies that the 14 year old is not being pressured or coerced in any way.

I have a BIG problem with priests fondling (or more) ANY boy - gay or straight. Much more so than for any woman having sex with a boy. For two reasons:

1) Homosexuality still carries an extremely negative stigma in this country, and any boy, gay or straight, is bound to be ashamed of himself for engaging in an activity with a man who is UNDOUBTEDLY telling him that he must not let anyone know what he's done. This is simply not true of boys engaging in heterosexual sex: boys are LAUDED by their peers for having sex, and while an adult woman will no doubt swear the boy to secrecy, she will not genearally instill any shame in the boy for what he's done. It isn't SEX that fucks up boys and girls, it's our attitude ABOUT sex; it's the shame that girls and gay boys are made to feel about engaging in sex. Sex is a physical activity that rarely leaves any lasting physical damage. Any damage that results from consensual sex is purely mental, and entirely preventable.

2) Priest and other religious ilk are the biggest proponents of sex = sin in this fucking country. They take unnatural vows of celibacy, and pretend to be of a higher moral fiber than others, but are all too willing to abandon their moral standing if they can get a little action. Priests who prey on children (male or female, post or prepubescent) are twisted fucks who joined the priesthood in a futile attempt to escape whatever dark desires exist in them. They are incapable of having an honest, healthy sexual encounter with anyone.


Sex columnist Dan Savage likes to talk about the campfire rule: leaving less experienced sexual partners in better shape than you found them. If an adult is living by this rule, and if she/he is not coercing the child in any way, I have no problem with them having sex with a teenage. I do, however, think it's a dumb thing for them to do, given both the illegality of the act and our society's extremely immature view of sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC