You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #7: Speculation and the economics of hunger -- $13 billion to $317 billion index fund jump in 5 yrs [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-10 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. Speculation and the economics of hunger -- $13 billion to $317 billion index fund jump in 5 yrs
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/science/Speculation-and-the-economics-of-hunger/articleshow/6710033.cms


A recent report of the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, Olivier de Schutter, provides a damning indictment of the role of speculation in food commodities in fuelling the global food crisis. The report – 'Food Commodities Speculation and Food Price Crisis – was released on the eve of an emergency meeting of the UN-FAO on the instability in agricultural markets.

The global food crisis in 2007-08 led to an unprecedented number of people – close to a billion – sleeping hungry as global food prices shot through the roof. The global price of rice in this period rose by 165% and wheat by 67%. While there has been considerable debate since, on the reasons for this sharp spike in prices including the promotion of bio-fuels at the expense of foodgrain and the global crude oil shock, it is now clear that the magnitude of the price rise could not have been due to these factors. Nor could it have been due to changes in market fundamentals of demand and supply for food commodities, even though there were some murmurs from the IMF and one not so insignificant whimper from the then American president, of higher consumption in emerging economies like China and India.

What emerges from the UN Rapporteur's report is perhaps the most definitive account so far of the role of what he calls the "speculative bubble" as the price rise happened in an environment of rapacious speculation in food commodities. This speculation was led by large, powerful institutional investors, including hedge funds and investment banks who have otherwise little to do with agricultural commodities.

This new form of predatory speculation which picked up during the course of the last decade was dramatically different from the traditional forms of speculation in agricultural commodities which has existed ever since trade in agriculture started. While traditional speculation is based on demand and supply, and for most parts, helps in price discovery, the "momentum-based speculation" that powerful global investors indulged in was based on herd mentality which led to a vicious upward spiraling of prices.

Even traditional speculation can encourage hoarding and has led to devastating events like the Bengal Famine of 1943 which claimed three million lives. The extent of momentum-based speculation in recent years can be gauged from the fact that holdings in commodity index funds jumped from $13 billion to $317 billion between 2003 and 2008. This worrying trend was reported, through the crisis, by UNCTAD and FAO and also by those who profited most from this enterprise, including entities like Morgan Stanley and Lehmann Brothers.

With increasing acknowledgement of the need for reforming the global financial system in order to safeguard food security of the poor, the recent Dodd-Frank Act passed by the US Congress which limits the extent of such speculation, seems to have set the precedent for similar legislation proposed by the EU and other countries.

(snip)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC