You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #12: And Grayson. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. And Grayson.
Isn't that the lesser of two evils theme? Couldn't they have given it to the greens? Or more progressive Dems?

Why didn't Sestak win? I remember this board celebrating that Sestak beat Spector and being mad that Obama supported Spector originally. Maybe now we can admit Obama may have been right. If Toomey won, it makes sense that Spector had a better chance than Sestak.

Why didn't Feingold win? He was the one with the guts to vote against a bill Obama wanted, because it did not go far enough. Wouldn't his win have proven the message much better than his losing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC