You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MineralMan's Visual Guide to Commonly Misspelled Words: Issue 8 [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 10:31 AM
Original message
MineralMan's Visual Guide to Commonly Misspelled Words: Issue 8
Advertisements [?]
Today's issue is going to be a bit hard to illustrate, I know, but it's an important one. So, who's going to object if the illustrations I choose are somewhat lamer than usual. The homonyms for today are pretty confusing for many people, and for a simple reason. They seem to violate the standard rules of English. Except they don't really. The words for today are: Whose, Who's, and Whos. Since the last word is the easiest to illustrate, I'll start with it:

Whos

The plural of Who, as in Dr Seuss's Horton Hears a Who!:

Whos are the residents of Whoville, also the location of The Grinch Who Stole Christmas.



My favorite among the Whos is Cindy Lou Who:



Who's

There is only a single use for this spelling. It is an abbreviation for "Who is." Any other usage is incorrect. While it may seem as though it should also be used for the possessive of Who, that is not the case. There is no violation of the rules for the use of the apostrophe, since other pronouns also have a specific word for the possessive. For example, "your," as the possessive of "you," and "my" as the possessive of "me."




Whose

Whose is the possessive form of who. It is that simple. If you choose who's instead, people will wonder whose defective teaching methods led you astray. Whose is also sometimes used as a possessive for inanimate objects, animals, and concepts, when other structures might be awkward. While some object to that usage, as in "The play, whose cast is undistinguished, will probably close on opening night." Purists may object to that, but such constructions are widely used.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC