You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #25: Actually, he isn't disputing the 33% rate---merely how it's broken down. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. Actually, he isn't disputing the 33% rate---merely how it's broken down.
Edited on Tue Apr-05-11 01:23 PM by msanthrope
Note that Phillips isn't disputing that 33% of workers aren't there on any given day--he's just noting that he doesn't think that certain classes of workers, those on disability or restriction, should be counted in. He thinks you should only count the people who call in daily, sick.

Which is bunk--if 33% of Chicago garbageman aren't available to work on any given day, then it's time to fix that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC