Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Changes May Be Needed in Superfund, Chief Says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 04:33 AM
Original message
NYT: Changes May Be Needed in Superfund, Chief Says
Changes May Be Needed in Superfund, Chief Says
By MICHAEL JANOFSKY

Published: December 5, 2004


WASHINGTON, Dec. 4 - The head of the nation's Superfund program says that fundamental changes in the program may be necessary to continue cleanups as more contaminated sites demand attention and federal resources remain flat.

Thomas P. Dunne, an assistant administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency who oversees the Superfund, said pressures on the program's annual cleanup budget of $450 million and the growing list of sites to be restored were strangling the program's ability to operate effectively. A new report by the agency predicted that as many as 355,000 hazardous waste sites could require cleanup over the next three decades, at a cost of up to $250 billion.

As a result, Mr. Dunne said the time had come for "a frank, open and nonpartisan discussion" to balance public expectations for action and budgetary realities that make timely responses increasingly less likely....

***

....Since 1995, when Congress did not renew a special tax on polluters, the cleanup money has come entirely from taxpayers.

President Bush sought no increase in the fund three years ago, and Congress has rebuffed his requests to increase the budget by $150 million in each of the last two years. Recent program reviews by the environmental agency's inspector general have cited the need for hundreds of millions of dollars more to meet a growing backlog of sites....


(According to the article, Mr. Dunne, in a speech, suggested three possible courses of action: partial funding by private businesses with interests in cleanups; separating larger sites from smaller sites so communities could have "a more realistic picture of how much help they could expect and when"; and "halting the listing of more contaminated sites until current work is completed.")


http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/05/politics/05super.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ima Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. That was their first mistake.
Since 1995, when Congress did not renew a special tax on polluters, the cleanup money has come entirely from taxpayers.


Why should the tax payers have to pay to clean up polluters mess?


Why does this smell like Monsanto?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Adding this to turning back 30 years of environmental policy --
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. time to lower expectation for timely action---Bushies strike again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC