Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

KY: Panel won't certify race for Senate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ridgerunner Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 08:34 AM
Original message
KY: Panel won't certify race for Senate
Edited on Tue Dec-14-04 09:12 AM by ridgerunner
By Joseph Gerth
jgerth@courier-journal.com
The Courier-Journal




The Kentucky Board of Elections refused yesterday to certify the election of Democrat Virginia Woodward to the state Senate, saying it didn't want to wade into a battle that it expects to end before the state Supreme Court.

Rejecting the advice of the board's lawyer, who said it was required by law to certify the election, the three Republicans and three Democrats voted unanimously to table the matter.

If that decision stands, it means that neither Woodward nor her Republican opponent, Dana Seum Stephenson, will have the certification needed to be sworn in as the 37th District senator when the General Assembly meets next month. The campaign was thrown into disarray on the day before the Nov.2 general election, when Woodward filed suit claiming that Stephenson didn't meet residency requirements

>snip

Democrats in the Senate, however, blasted the board's decision and questioned whether it had fulfilled its duties.

"Has the state board of elections violated the law by refusing to follow the final order of the Jefferson Circuit Court ...? Is the State Board above the law?" Senate Minority Leader Ed Worley, D-Richmond, asked in a statement. The board's vote to table the certification came after a public discussion that was dominated by Kirkland, who argued that Willett didn't specifically order the board to certify the election.

more:http://www.courier-journal.com/localnews/2004/12/14ky/A1-seum1214-6215.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftyandproud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. so who got more votes???
this thing is confusing me...I don't know what they are doing in ky. LEt the people decide. Revote if they have to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ridgerunner Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Kentucky politics is always interesting
Stephenson got about a thousand more votes than Woodward, but three weeks after the election, a Jefferson Circuit judge ordered that Stephenson's votes not be counted.

Stephenson admitted that she lived in Indiana during four of the six years before the election, and Judge Barry Willett ruled that she did not meet a constitutional requirement that she be a Kentucky resident for the six years prior to her election.

http://www.courier-journal.com/localnews/2004/12/14ky/A1-seum1214-6215.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American Tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Here's what is really crazy about this
All of us who live near the district already knew that Stevenson was ineligible for months before the election. It was public knowledge that she hadn't lived in Kentucky for the requisite years. I think she lived in Jeffersonville before, which is a just a few miles outside of Louisville but nevertheless not in Kentucky.

In order to become a candidate, you have to sign a form stating that you fulfill the requirements, and she obviously lied. We knew it, and it wasn't lost on the judges either.

We were all wondering from the beginning how exactly she thought she was going to get away with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ridgerunner Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think this says it all
"Stephenson has, however, asked the Republican-controlled Senate to determine that she is the winner and seat her."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is an outrage. Doesn't that judge know Republicans
Edited on Tue Dec-14-04 12:08 PM by Benhurst
don't have to follow the law? If the knuckle-draggers in Kentucky want Stephenson, they should have her. Who cares about the law in BushAmerica?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. LOL! Sad, but true!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC