Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS REJECTS INTERIOR SECRETARY NORTON’S CLAIM OF ATTORNE

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 01:19 PM
Original message
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS REJECTS INTERIOR SECRETARY NORTON’S CLAIM OF ATTORNE
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS REJECTS INTERIOR SECRETARY NORTON’S CLAIM OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
Washington, D.C., September 10: In a significant victory for Indians seeking a full accounting of their trust funds and full accountability for mismanagement of the Individual Indian Trust, an independent three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia unanimously reaffirmed Judge Lamberth's decision and sharply rebuked Interior Secretary Norton in her improper efforts to withhold critical information from the Indian trust beneficiaries throughout her troubled trusteeship.

The Court of Appeals held that Secretary Norton has “waived” any rights to challenge “the District Court’s application of the fiduciary exception to the attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine”. The Court of Appeals therefore dismissed the appeals “with prejudice” and permitted plaintiffs ’ costs to be assessed.

In addition, the appellate court ordered Ms. Norton in her individual capacity to show cause why she should continue to participate in these proceedings and thereby allow her personal counsel to run up legal fees at tax payer expense. To date, her personal counsel has been paid approximately $500,000, primarily for an amicus brief in a prior appeal in this case.

Elliott Levitas who has led the appellate defense for plaintiffs explained the importance of this ruling:

http://www.indiantrust.com/index.cfm?

FuseAction=PressReleases.ViewDetail&PressRelease_id=93&Month=9&Year=2003
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Will we hear "Executive Privelige" or Security reasons?
One way or another she will get out of relinquishing the important information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Repubs
are trying to put a cap on settlements anyway, so this case is destined to never be settled the way it should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good thing Gale has a job waiting back at Mountain States Legal
Edited on Wed Sep-10-03 01:47 PM by hatrack
She and her old mentor, James Watt, can sit in one of the back cubicles and throw darts at the Apocalypso-Board and run the office betting pool on when Jesus will return, obviating any need for land stewardship - that is, when they're not busy suing SUWA or the Sierra Club.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jburton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Norton
She could always get a job in the snowmobile industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC