C.I.A. Report Finds Its Officials Failed in Pre-9/11 Efforts -NYT

An internal investigation by the Central Intelligence Agency has concluded that officials who served at the highest levels of the agency should be held accountable for failing to allocate adequate resources to combating terrorism before the Sept. 11 attacks, according to current and former intelligence officials.

The conclusion is spelled out in a near-final version of a report by John Helgerson, the agency's inspector general, who reports to Congress as well as to the C.I.A. Among those most sharply criticized in the report, the officials said, are George J. Tenet, the former intelligence chief, and James L. Pavitt, the former deputy director of operations. Both Mr. Tenet and Mr. Pavitt stepped down from their posts last summer.

The findings, which are still classified, pose a quandary for the C.I.A. and the administration, particularly since President Bush awarded a Medal of Freedom to Mr. Tenet last month. It is not clear whether either the agency or the White House has the appetite to reprimand Mr. Tenet, Mr. Pavitt or others.

The report says that Mr. Pavitt, among others, failed to meet an acceptable standard of performance, and it recommends that his conduct be assessed by an internal review board for possible disciplinary action, the officials said. The criticism of Mr. Tenet is cast in equally strong terms, the officials said, but they would not say whether it reached a judgment about whether his performance had been acceptable. ........

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/07/national/07intel.html?8bl

were, wouldn't it?

LIHOP or MIHOP?

I trust the BFEE as far as I can throw them.

he was paid off and allowed to leave for a little vacation before becoming the official fall guy.

i saw on the Daily Show last nite that 20/20 (or Dateline) is doing an expose on homeland security officials being treated to a Hawaii vacation on tax money.

should have been a Medal of Freedom.

Mr. Tenet, through his incompetence, contributed greatly to Mr. Bush's agenda - in which 911 was used as an excuse for every right wing proposal - and Mr. Bush's reelection (the WAR President). Of course, Mr. Bush contributed to his own success by not asking any questions when he was warned of an impending attack within the U.S.

his plans...

and given the evidence that Tenet was known to feed Bush's hubris, for example, by telling him the WMD thing was a "slam-dunk..."

i think you can only conclude that Bush already knew the deal and required Tenet to "go along to get along."

I thought it was another part of the 911 Commission report they wouldn't release before the election. This is an internal CIA report. I believe they are two (out of how many?) different reports.

that was a report * and Rove didn't want released before the election.

I really hope in the next 4 years of hell the American people are shown what a fraud this bunch is.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/102004V.shtml

The 9/11 Secret in the CIA's Back Pocket
By Robert Scheer
The Los Angeles Times

Tuesday 19 October 2004

The agency is withholding a damning report that points at senior officials.
It is shocking: The Bush administration is suppressing a CIA report on 9/11 until after the election, and this one names names. Although the report by the inspector general's office of the CIA was completed in June, it has not been made available to the congressional intelligence committees that mandated the study almost two years ago.

"It is infuriating that a report which shows that high-level people were not doing their jobs in a satisfactory manner before 9/11 is being suppressed," an intelligence official who has read the report told me, adding that "the report is potentially very embarrassing for the administration, because it makes it look like they weren't interested in terrorism before 9/11, or in holding people in the government responsible afterward."

When I asked about the report, Rep. Jane Harman (D-Venice), ranking Democratic member of the House Intelligence Committee, said she and committee Chairman Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich.) sent a letter 14 days ago asking for it to be delivered. "We believe that the CIA has been told not to distribute the report," she said. "We are very concerned."

According to the intelligence official, who spoke to me on condition of anonymity, release of the report, which represents an exhaustive 17-month investigation by an 11-member team within the agency, has been "stalled." First by acting CIA Director John McLaughlin and now by Porter J. Goss, the former Republican House member (and chairman of the Intelligence Committee) who recently was appointed CIA chief by President Bush.

Be reassured.

No more daily meetings. The funny thing? Should there be another attack, they will again claim ignorance and the memory-challenged public will forgive.

Not, ever.

Doug Feith and Steve Cambone's peers and appointees-these are the folks that hitched up to Chalabi, the PNACer's that went to war with the CIA and made them the fall guy for 9/11. There's been a coup of sorts since 12-12-2000 imo.

SOME OF THEM MADE MONEY, CLOSE TO THE BUSH ADMIN, BUT NO ONE IS TALKING YET--

http://www.ideamouth.com/politics

:hi:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/07/national/07intel.html

C.I.A. Report Finds Its Officials Failed in Pre-9/11 Efforts
By DOUGLAS JEHL


<snip>
The C.I.A. would not comment on the report. A spokesman for Mr. Tenet, Bill Harlow, also declined to comment on it, except to say that Mr. Tenet had recently reviewed parts of the report and would be responding to it soon. But Mr. Harlow said that "to criticize Mr. Tenet for devoting insufficient resources to counterterrorism would be absurd."

In response to questions, Mr. Pavitt confirmed that he had read parts of the report, and that it concluded that "I, or components or processes for which I was responsible, may not have performed in a satisfactory manner." Mr. Pavitt said that he disagreed with the findings "on many accounts" and had provided a dissent to Mr. Helgerson.

"I believe the findings are flawed," Mr. Pavitt said. He acknowledged that the agency's directorate of operations, which he supervised, did not have adequate resources before the Sept. 11 attacks but said that he had "consistently fought for additional resources, commencing that effort in 1997 and stopping only in August 2004 when I retired."

<snip>

sure didn't seem to blame George Tenet...he blamed the Bush administration extensively as well as the FBI and then the
"bureaucracy" of Washington in so many words...

I find this very convenient...after the election to blame someone
who's gone, who got some medal from the Bush administration.

Re: CIA IG 9/11 Report

Let's face it, the CIA IG and ARB are just going through the motions. The Congressional Joint Committee and the 9/11 Commission, as well. Nobody rolled up the UBL cells in the U.S. before the attacks because Bush didn't order it when Tenet presented him with that option on several occasions.

From DCI downward, the Agency has fallen on its sword to protect POTUS. At the end of the day, that's its job, isn't it? In particular, George Tenet even committed perjury to cover up the August 24, 2001 meeting at Crawford with W, Rummy, Condi, Hughes, and Gen. Myers. GT perjured himself in his testimony before the Commission last March when he denied that meeting with Bush along with others in the weeks before 9/11 had even taken place. The public record held to the contrary, and Tenet got a pass as he had "misspoken." By the way, that was the day after the CIA finally watchlisted the Flt. 77 hijackers and two others whom the Agency had observed at the Kuala Lumpur Al-Qaida planning summit. Does anyone really believe that topic wasn't discussed during the August 24 get together at Bush's ranch? The next day, the White House press office quoted W as describing his meeting with Tenet, et al. as one of the longest in his memory thrashing out "a very important subject."

Just thought I'd share that item before it disappears down the memory hole. For details, see:
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0406/S0015 <...>

(Carried over from duplicate string)

Sorry - The address for the Tenet perjury article was snipped off.

Try: http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0406/S00153.htm

David Ray Griffin's new book is a most highly recommended
book about the flaws of the Official 9/11 Commission's Report:

http://www.interlinkbooks.com/Books_/911CommRep.html
"The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions
A Critique of the Kean-Zelikow Report
By David Ray Griffin

This is part of a recent outreach note . . .
"9/11 Truth: The Key to Systemic Change"
"Given the momentum and added strength of the corporate forces now in
power, citizens will face unending appeals this year to combat
firestorms on many different fronts.

"We can struggle to prioritize our donations to stop war atrocities,
environmental assaults, our grandkids' ballooning debt, attacks on our
rights and Constitution, the shredding of the social safety net, and a
dozen other centrifugal symptoms of the sickness at the top.

"OR we can step back a pace or two and see where all this carnage
connects and focus our resources on tactics that would stop it all at once."
(much more) - DK


To learn more about the 9/11 Truth Movement:

www.911truth.org/