Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush says troops will come home soon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 02:53 PM
Original message
Bush says troops will come home soon
http://www.duluthsuperior.com/mld/duluthsuperior/news/nation/10661011.htm

WASHINGTON - President Bush says the U.S. military will pull out of Iraq "as quickly as possible," but he is not endorsing Secretary of State Colin Powell's statement that troops could begin returning home this year.

"The way I would put it is, American troops will be leaving as quickly as possible, but they won't be leaving until we have completed our mission," Bush said in a Washington Post story published Sunday.

"And part of the mission is to train Iraqis so they can fight the terrorists. And the sooner the Iraqis are prepared - better prepared, better equipped to fight - the sooner our troops will start coming home," Bush said.

Powell told National Public Radio last week that he believes Americans could begin leaving Iraq this year as the Iraqis take on a larger security role. Powell, in his final days as the government's chief diplomat, said he could not give a timeline when all the troops will be home.

Bush said the U.S. military is "constantly assessing" if Iraqi security forces are up to the job, allowing the United States to begin pulling out. The president would not commit to significantly reduce troops by the end of his second term in 2009.

<SNIP>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bush Inc doesn't have a f***ing clue what they are doing
Edited on Sun Jan-16-05 02:56 PM by Skittles
probably still thinking of ways to blame the entire fiasco on Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. Ummmm *LOL* didn't he also say NO TROOP WITHDRAWAL,...
,...NO PLANS TO WITHDRAW TROOPS just yesterday? *LOL*

The neoCONimperialists PLAN a permanent military presence in the Middle East.

EVERYONE but the Americans knows this to be true.

These deceptive butt-holes aggravate me to no end because they get away with breaching their sworn oathes to the American people: manipulating minds and funnelling public lives and national wealth into a plan which leads to mass destruction.

I swear to GOD I will live to witness the neoCONimperialists FACE JUSTICE!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julius Civitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. This is an admission of FAILURE
Edited on Sun Jan-16-05 04:17 PM by Julius Civitatus
They misled us to war, they lied about their reasons and lied about the potential outcome of this war. Now the mission is a mess, Iraq has become a powder-keg about to explode in a Balkan-style civil war, and we have destroyed our reputation as the Democratic nation on earth with the moral upper hand. After the crimes in Falluja, the torture in Abu Grahib, and the lack of any WMD, we leave Iraq WORSE than we were in the way in. And we have left that country in absolute chaos.

Yeah, nice fucking job, Dumbya!

Now in the midst of the mess, he wants to pack up and leave the mess for someone else to clean. Horrible. Absolutely horrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
34. How willl Bush react if our slow defeat expels the US forces
Edited on Sun Jan-16-05 04:42 PM by cyclezealot
the way the uprising kicked out the British in the 1920's ? Will he allow a slow burning VietNam to bleed his Administration dry..
How can Dubya build an Iraqi army if the insurrection kills the new Iraqi army faster than Bush trains them...?
And how will the American people react should Bush face facts and cut and runs with a hostile Iraqi government in place?? Will the American people praise Dictator Bush for his vision??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, I see. If the Iraqis can't get their sh*t together, it's their fault
See how simple it is? Our troops would come home sooner, except those ignorant Iraqis just can't get their act together. It's all their fault. Never our fault. Never, ever, ever our fault. We are the administration of no-blame, nonaccountability. Not. Our. Fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Translation? Sorry folks, we have to wait for the civil war to start,
fight that for, oh say 10 years or so, and then skeddadle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. The "Vietnamization" of Iraq
"And part of the mission is to train Iraqis so they can fight the terrorists. And the sooner the Iraqis are prepared - better prepared, better equipped to fight - the sooner our troops will start coming home," Bush said.

I've heard these songs before. Soon they'll be telling us there is light at the end of the tunnel.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. It's called the "FUBAR-Exit-Strategy..."
...the key is to get the eff out with their tail high, and not in-between their legs. AKA "Peace With Honor...":eyes::puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
51. Or the new friendly
Iraqi army uses US training and weapons to kick us out.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
55. "winning hearts and minds"...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. ahhh, unfortunately the Duluth News is putting words in * mouth, he didn't
say "soon"......(pet peeve - headline writers with an agenda)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Misleading headline
Not you; the headline writer in Duluth.

"soon" is not equal to "as quickly as possible."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. I was going to say "creative"
exactly right. Bush didn't say what the headline says he said, not even close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. I thought so as well.
From the land of journalistic illusion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastLiberal in PalmSprings Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
36. Headline has been revised: "Bush: U.S. Not Rushing to Leave Iraq"
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #36
48. The exact opposite of the original headline...
Edited on Sun Jan-16-05 06:03 PM by Tom Yossarian Joad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. * crack head
to dimson the fool this is a no win no win situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Translation: Some will come home. Most, as well as new troops
will be there for a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Article is mistitled
Edited on Sun Jan-16-05 03:03 PM by lwfern
Bush says "as soon as possible" once the mission is completed.

Reporter spins this as "soon."

(edit, I see others beat me to it)

Also, the article ignores that the mission was announced as completed last year, and neglects to state what the full mission currently is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildwww2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
62. In May it will be 2 years since the war criminal said Mission Accomplished
with his stupid photo op on the USS Abraham Lincoln. Bu$h makes my dogs droppings look Presidential. Yet the media whores still tout this lunatic a some kind of leader. My son is not yet 5 and he can read aloud better than the AWOL chimp. And I am not lying. That is just scary as hell.
Peace
Wildman
Al Gore is My President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #62
69. The mission WAS accomplished
If by mission, you mean lying the American people into a stupid war to appease some airhead antagonistic world-conquering freaks. That he did just great.

And over 100,000 people have died as a result. The Mideast, like almost the entire world, despises us, we're flat broke, and this prissy little scumbag is going to waltz back to Texas in four years convinced that he's right, the entire world is wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. They "WILL COME HOME IN THE DARK" in bodybags
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. he's saying this so the chances are lessened he won't get a pie
thrown in his face on Inauguration Day. He doesn't mean a word of this. Also "as soon as possible" can mean 50 years, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. Poorly written headline.
I don't see anything about them coming home "soon". Just "sooner rather than later".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yeah, he's eager to send troops into Syria, Iran, ...
But now he'll be strutting around saying in effect that the "elections" in Iraq have made him the Abraham Lincoln of that country. He'll proclaim victory in Iraq against all those who "fear freedom" there and move on to the next war. Will Congress stop him this time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guajira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. Does that Mean Halliburton will also come home??
And will we give up the oil wells? What about the world's largest embassy we have there in Saddam's palace? And those 14 bases we're planning to have there?

These are questions the media should be asking -- but won't!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlcandie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
17. Soon as in his next vacation or soon as in when he will tell the truth?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
18. Two soldiers a day, George. Stay in Iraq as long as you want.
"Bring'em on!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. Soon, but not this year? It's January. That's at least a year before
they will leave.

Also, what is our mission? Bush said: ...they won't be leaving until we have completed our mission... Is our mission to find WMD? I think we gave up on that one. Is our mission to depose Saddam Hussein? We did that. I can't remember what our mission is supposed to be anymore.

And what is this? ...The president would not commit to significantly reduce troops by the end of his second term in 2009... Where is the soon in 2009?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockedthevoteinMA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. Wasn't there an article just YESTERDAY of * saying they wouldn't
be coming home soon? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
21. Incredible! He said no such thing.
It's always been "as soon as possible."

In a war that "may not end in our lifetime," what hope does that offer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
followthemoney Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
23. Bush tells only half of the story.
The rest of the story is that more troops will be sent in to replace the ones leaving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
24. But I thought they already ARE coming home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vixengrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. "they won't be leaving until we have completed our mission".
Well, the reason for going changed around a bit, so I suppose what constitutes a completed mission is also subject to change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
27. Ah, so these colors DO run....
Whatever happened to stay the course? This seems like a major course correction to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massachusetts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
29. FUBAR
"The way I would put it is, American troops will be leaving as quickly as possible, but they won't be leaving until we have completed our mission," Bush said in a Washington Post story published Sunday.

Its been one hell of a mission so far. stay tuned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
30. That headline is plastered EVERYWHERE and it's bullshit!
He did not say they're coming home soon.. he said as soon as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
31. "Just as soon as the bombs start dropping on Iran,
you see, our troops will be leaving Iraq" Bush sniffed and spat. "Iran, Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq- what am I forgetting again....oh yeah, uh- Saudi Arabia- I always fergit that one. Our troops'll be out of Iraq soon enough, don't you worry. We got lots more stuff for those fellas to do".

"Don't worry, we got a plan. It's clearly a plan. It's got maps and stuff on it".




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
True_Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
32. "until we have completed our mission"
In other words...Never!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
33. Light at the end of the tunnel
I see the light at the end of the tunnel, and it is a freight train.

So if Bush withdraws the US troops, who is going to staff the 14+ permanent bases, contractors and mercinaries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
35. So now the mission is fighting terrorism?? I thought we went there for
to "liberate" the Iraqis to death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mad_Dem_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Well, first it was the WMD's,
then it was to "liberate" them...now it's to fight terrorism - which has been increasing since we got there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emillereid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
38. When they dismantle the 14 permanent bases I'll believe the troops
are leaving. Fast chance they'll give up their forward bases until the mission of complete control over the oil spigot is complete -- and everyone every where is doing what we say in exchange for some energy to run their economies. Wonder what the purchase orders for Iraq say -- that's usually the best way to gauge what the real plans are.

Of course, the resistance fighters in Iraq appear to have other plans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
africangreys5 Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
39. it won't be
for a year or two, I bet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. Honey, there is a reason there was no exit strategy.
They never planned to leave. That is why we built permanent bases.
When did we leave Germany? When did we leave Japan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clem_c_rock Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #43
61. Thanks - Exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
40. Sound like double (W) speak to me......
The president would not commit to significantly reduce troops by the end of his second term in 2009. So what was the purpose of the article.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porkrind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
41. * will be sending them to Iran this summer.
According to Seymore Hersch, * is gearing up to move against Iran this summer, so I guess if "home" is Iran, then he might be right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hadrons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
42. Yahoo! has this: Bush says U.S. not rushing to leave Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #42
50. I saw that too
Edited on Sun Jan-16-05 06:14 PM by Malva Zebrina
they are not going to leave until the mission is accomplished.

Excuse me? What was the mission anyhow. Wasn't it regime change and to take Saddam out? Well you got him and Iraq is in the worst condition ever it has been, and tens of thousands have been murdered by you, a war criminal and an evil man. Didn't you announce, you little prick, that the "mission" was accomplished last May aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln?


No , you took that back and now you will claim that elections, a bogus lie, will take place bringing the Iraqi people, democracy and freedom just like we have, only you had to murder tens of thousands of them to do so and you had to lie to your own people to do so and you continue to lie, every single day of your miserable life.

No, after these "elections' and you have installed y9our puppet, you will claim that everything thereafter that is misery and suffering is the fault of the Iraqi people. You will proceed to blame them, those poor suffering souls who have been your victims.

What the hell is the mission? Does this jerk even know? Is it to bomb villages to ground, and kill as many inncent Iraqi children and women and old men as you can?

This man is insane. Please somebody come along and take him out of our house. Somebody please tell it to the American people the way it is.

He is INSANE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
llmart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
44. Well, if you're going to put it that way.....
some have come home already, albeit in body bags.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
45. Suuure. And Saddam had WMDs. And he caused 9/11...
..and the tax cuts will go to the bottom percent...and you never said you were not worried about Bin Laden...

Wanna buy some wood?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clem_c_rock Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
46. How then, does he esplain this: http://www.nysun.com/article/7680
and 14 permanent bases?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
47. And Hitler Promised He'd Stop With Czechoslovakia!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
49. So where's this training of Iraqi troops?
Doesn't there have to be some sort of stability before they can start training troops?

And how does that stability come about if the Iraqis want us out and keep fighting (and who can blame them)?

So no stability equals no training of troops. No training of Iraqi troops equal no US troops coming home. No US troops coming home means permanent presence in Iraq.

Which means this is all a big show to the bush administration. Just keep the people strung along---drop whispers and hints of when the troops MIGHT come home to keep the families and anti-war folks wondering.....

It's a game. It's nothing but a dirty game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
52. "THEY won't be leaving until WE have complete OUR mission"
* got they right. Them that die.

* ain't too clear about we...and our. Rovian Chickenhawks haven't fought for a silverspoon in their lives...and the pResident wants to problem they won't leave until the NeoCon mission is complete.

Funny how it works that way...hard werk that it 'tis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
53. Bush lives everyday like it's opposite day
What ever he says is the exact opposite of the truth. Unfortunately that means a lot more are going to die for a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
despairing optimist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
54. Then why are the rules for reservists' duty extension being rewritten?
Something's not smelling like roses here. I'm shocked, shocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
56. they just have to finish the mission.
which is. . . um. . . let me see here. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
57. Is that "Yossarian"...as in "Catch 22?" Or just coincidence?
One of my favorite anti-war books.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manly Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
58. premature withdrawal from Iraq
Edited on Sun Jan-16-05 10:03 PM by manly
And what happens if, after we leave the war to the well-trained Iraqi army, they get their ass handed to them by the terrorists, as I expect will happen? (After all, they're doing it to us.)
Do we go back in, claiming a case of coitus interruptus?
Do we say, once we've pulled out, we're staying out?
Do we just bomb the shit out of everybody?
Have you thought ahead that far, george, you shithead? Well, you'd better start planning now 'cause it sure as hell is going to happen, you morron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
59. Here today, they ran tomorrow. They ran to Iran, that is... and believe *
are you kidding?

* knows that when the troopie-dupedees leave Iraq, the "insurgents" will happily tapdance over to the remaining oil wells and destroy them.

* dug this country into a hole. There is no way out. Lord knows he will try, but in doing so he'll dig the hole beyond the barrier of infinity.

In other words, to borrow a phrase from a cool robot, "We're boned."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicagojoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
60. More Lies !!!!!
Someone, please, DO THE RIGHT THING!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
63. What a liar...
Does anyone here watch "Six Feet Under"? Remember when Nate was looking at the morning paper with Bush on the cover and said "he just lies and lies and nobody says a thing"? I just remembered that and thought it would fit right now. I can't believe all these idiots who voted that sorry excuse into office.

He'll blame anything bad that happens on us, the lowly Dems who have no power. Somehow it'll always be our fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
64. And Gen Franks says it'll take TEN YEARS (10) to train Iraqis
So "coming home soon" = in about a DECADE.

And after the DRAFT is reinstated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms_Mary Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
65. ASAP but he can't garuntee the number of troops will be reduced by the
end of his term. How's that for doublespeak?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFWJock Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #65
66. cut n' run
CUT N'RUN!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
67. He's lying and doesn't have a clue what to do! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ernstbass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
68. Liar liar pants on fire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
70. Yeah, the ever undefinable "soon"
Too bad people keep buying this shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
71. Setting the stage for more $$$ and blaming Dems for a prolonged
engagement if they don't approve more spending? Perhaps he has 2006 elections on his mind. The "unpatriotic" label worked last time around. :shrug:

"And part of the mission is to train Iraqis so they can fight the terrorists. And the sooner the Iraqis are prepared - better prepared, better equipped to fight - the sooner our troops will start coming home," Bush said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
72. Major combat ops have been over since Stuffed Flight Suit Day,seems
like most would be back by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC