Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Amid Praise, Doubts About Nominee's Post-9/11 Role

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 10:51 PM
Original message
WP: Amid Praise, Doubts About Nominee's Post-9/11 Role
Monday, January 31, 2005; Page A01

On Nov. 28, 2001, then-Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff took a seat before a Senate committee and offered reassurance on two fronts: The Justice Department was unrelenting in pursuit of terrorists. And none of its tactics had trampled the Constitution or federal law.

Every detainee has been charged, Chertoff told the senators. Every detainee has a lawyer. No one is held incommunicado.

"Are we being aggressive and hard-nosed? You bet." Chertoff leaned into the microphone. "But let me emphasize that every step that we have taken satisfies the Constitution and federal law as it existed both before and after September 11th."

It was classic Chertoff, eloquent and unyielding and intense, his body coiled like a middleweight boxer's. He returned again and again to his bottom line: The World Trade Center and a portion of the Pentagon were in ruins; two letters had arrived at the Senate laden with billions of anthrax microbes. Osama bin Laden had declared war on the United States -- what would you have us do?

Few questioned Chertoff's urgency, but his critics contend that he was not candid with the senators, and was perhaps misleading about the nature of the tactics he pursued. The Justice Department ordered the detention of more than 700 Arab and South Asian men for immigration violations, holding them without charges or access to lawyers for an average of three months. Many remained in prison much longer, according to a 2003 report by Justice Department Inspector General Glenn A. Fine.

more…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A49950-2005Jan30.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. They should all be in jail for these lies which seem to be everyday for
the Republican party.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msgadget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. He absolutely must be as sharply questioned as Gonzales and Rice
and voted against. It looks like that may happen.

Democrats are expected to sharply question Chertoff's decision to order the detention of immigrants -- not one of whom was charged with a terrorism-related crime. A number of these immigrants were beaten and humiliated by prison officers.

They also are expected to scrutinize Chertoff's role in crafting the USA Patriot Act.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC