Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Frustrated Democrats Find a Voice

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:08 PM
Original message
WP: Frustrated Democrats Find a Voice
Frustrated Democrats Find a Voice
Lawmakers Use Policy Committee to Investigate Issues They Say GOP Ignores

By Dana Milbank
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, February 15, 2005; Page A03

C-SPAN viewers tuning in yesterday morning might have thought they misread the results of November's elections.

There was Sen. Byron L. Dorgan (N.D.) -- a Democrat -- wielding a gavel and calling to order a hearing on Iraq contracts. Dorgan presided over a wood-paneled Senate hearing room, complete with water pitchers on the witness table, name plates for the committee members, and C-SPAN 1 -- live!

But, paying closer attention, the viewers might have noticed that there were no Republicans on the panel, no administration officials at the witness table, and only two Democratic senators in the room. Then, the viewer might have surmised, correctly, that this was not a real committee hearing.

-snip-
But Democrats still have the power to raise a ruckus. And one of their best vehicles for raising a ruckus is the Democratic Policy Committee, a taxpayer-funded entity established by law and given the power to hold meetings, pay for witnesses' travel and, on a good day, get coverage from C-SPAN.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A24511-2005Feb14.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. THEY NEED TO START RAISING F***ING HELL
the neocons are sending America in a downward spiral; it has GOT to stop
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Damn right.
Stand up, jellyfish!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Milbank really cut to the nut of the matter in this one
NOT! ALL process, NO substance. The best he did was to include the TOPIC of the hearing.

Why even bother to write it up? Oh, yeah- chase the drama of how completely POWERLESS the dems are. Well they are if the FREAKING reporters won't even go into any DETAIL about the issues they raise!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well, there is a WP article on the content of the Hearings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Good
And they are listed on the same page. It's weird to see Milbank writing with even less substance than before he left the WH press corps. Since access might not be such a big issue, I kept hoping he'd really get aggressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. What happened to checks and balances?
"The Democrats' complaint is that Republicans, who control the real committees, will not hold hearings on anything that might embarrass the administration. "There is a serious problem here in the Congress with a lack of oversight hearings," Dorgan said at his hearing/event.

Republicans were not moved by Dorgan's entreaties. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, said that Iraq contracts already receive "intense scrutiny" from a variety of entities. "I plan to continue monitoring such oversight to ensure that our taxpayer dollars are spent wisely," she said in a statement."

Do people still think of Susan Collins as one of the "good" Republicans? I hope not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I heard her this AM commenting on Chertoff....she was expressing
frustration about the delays to his coronation, saying that he's going to be confirmed ANYWAY....I hate that word, anyway--means we're not supposed to air the dirty laundry...

She sounds like a jerk when she talks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'm embarrassed to say she beat Chellie Pingree, head of Common Cause,
for re-election.

Collins is useless in Congress....I can't stand to listen to her either. She grates on me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Susan Collins has become co-opted completely
She is no Olympia Snowe.

Who are the Democrats in Maine that they vote for someone as mealy-mouthed as Susan Collins?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. has Olympia seriously opposed the Republican agenda?
seems her votes and voice over the last 4 years have been just as dependable for them as Collins

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. This article might be helpful to Collins ...
all of them need to be approached with how much longer are they going to cover and support the corruption and lies ....



Mom & Pop War Profiteering Team - Woolseys

By Evelyn Pringle
Miamisburg, Ohio
Scoop.co.nz
17 January 2005


In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

The Defense Policy Board (DPB) is a hand-picked group of 30 people that advises Bush administration officials on matters such as whether and when to go to war, or not. The current group was selected by Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, Douglas Feith, and approved by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. Everyone who is anyone in the arms and defense industry knows that palling up to DPB members is the ticket to getting a Pentagon contract.

Shortly after the war in Iraq began, the April 10, 2003 New York Times pointed out that several board members stood to benefit financially from the war. It reported that the Center for Public Integrity (CPI) documented that 9 of the members were "linked to companies that have won more than $76 billion in defense contracts in 2001 and 2002."

Promote War & Garner Positions For Profits

One of the members mentioned who stood to profit was R. James Woolsey. In addition to being a member of the DPB, Woolsey also sits on Navy and CIA advisory boards; and he is also a founding member of the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq (CLI), a private group that was specifically set up by Bush in 2002, to find ways to increase public support for a war against Iraq.

Let me say right here and now that I think bold lines are crossed when people like Woolsey, who promote a specific war, financially benefit from their successful promotion. There should be a law that requires a standard recusal from all war profits by any policy advisor who advocates sending our young men and women off to die in that same war.

And I don't know about anybody else, but I've never heard of our government forming a group of promoters to rally support for a war before. I dare anyone to try and convince me that this war profiteering scheme wasn't well planned and managed from the get-go.

Mom & Pop Team Of War Profiteers

I would rate the husband and wife team of James and Suzanne Woolsey up there as one of the most blatant examples of war profiting that I've ever seen. They both remain policy advisors on Iraq, even though they both work for private firms that do business there.

~snip~

http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0501/S00107.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
despairing optimist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. Democratic Caucus ========> Democratic Ruckus
The room where everyone gets a chance to scream and not be nice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. Gee Dana, now why would that be?
I can't imagine why the Democrats are reduced to holding their own hearings in a little-used room in order to get something, anything before the public. Maybe if your newspaper and a couple of other papers, as well as an hour or so a day out of the electronic media's nonstop Republispew were interrupted for some responsible opposing viewpoints, this quaint and pathetic little show wouldn't need to go forward.

Instead, we get hours and hours of uninterrupted and unrebutted Faux, Rash, Brit, Michael, Lars and all the rest, to be balanced off by . . . Alan Colmes.

A real domescratcher there, Dana. Hard to figure out, isn't it? By the way, the tiny little area deep in your skull that kind of hurts right now? It's your brain. Pick up another paycheck and I'm sure the pain will go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC