Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reservists' Lost Benefits... Active-Duty Status Was Dropped, GAO Finds

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
LiviaOlivia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 03:51 AM
Original message
Reservists' Lost Benefits... Active-Duty Status Was Dropped, GAO Finds
Reservists' Lost Benefits Reported
Active-Duty Status Was Dropped, GAO Finds

By Ann Scott Tyson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, February 18, 2005

Hundreds and perhaps thousands of injured Army National Guard and Reserve soldiers -- including many severely wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan -- have either lost or risked losing medical care and thousands of dollars in pay for months because a "convoluted" personnel system dropped them from active-duty status, according to a Government Accountability Office report released yesterday.

The report found that over a two-month period early last year, almost 34 percent of the 867 soldiers whose records it examined were removed from active duty while their requests for medical extensions were snarled in bureaucracy, leading many soldiers and their families to lose pay and benefits.

The Army does not track the numbers of injured and ill reservists suffering such gaps in pay and benefits, but with 16,000 reservists having passed through the military's "medical holdover" system since November 2003, and 3,400 there now, the total is "very possibly thousands," said Gregory D. Kutz, director of financial management and assurance at the GAO and author of the report.

~snip~

The main source of the problem, according to the GAO, Army officials and soldiers, was the obsolete Active Duty Medical Extension program, set up in July 2000 for reservists injured while on active duty or in training. The influx of wounded reservists from the Iraq war quickly overwhelmed the office, which had a staff of three people when it began receiving 25 to 30 cases for review every day in December 2003.

~snip~

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A33627-2005Feb17.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Support the troops!!! Cut their benefits!!! Screw up their pay!!!
Charge them for their meals while in hospital for their blown-off limbs and brain damage!!!

Charge them for the equipment they lost in attacks!!!

Don't provide them with enough rifles and ammo and body armor 2 years later!!!

Don't start up-armoring their vehicles until 2 years later!!!

Leave the wounded to rot in fly-infested barracks with no toilets so they must crawl on their hands and knees outside!!!

Conscript them and send them to illegal Hitleresque wars of aggression to kill people who hadn't done anything to anyone!!!

WOOOOOOHOOOOOO GOD BLESS BUSH!!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anitar1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. No Respect
No respect for cannon fodder these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
llmart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Maybe it's time for the troops......
to start speaking out for themselves. Many of them voted for Bush thinking he actually cared about them. They need to find their voices and quit playing "good soldier" while the Bush cabal uses them for their own personal gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC