Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Governor Fails to Curb Big Money -LAT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 11:33 AM
Original message
Governor Fails to Curb Big Money -LAT
Edited on Mon Feb-21-05 11:35 AM by Rose Siding
While criticizing the system, Schwarzenegger continues to raise millions to help his political agenda and seeks to lift restrictions.

SACRAMENTO — Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger ousted a sitting governor and entered elective politics by deploring a system in which "the money comes in and the favors go out."

But as he promotes his political agenda for 2005, Schwarzenegger has failed to curb big money in politics. Rather, he seeks the freedom to raise unlimited amounts.

A few weeks ago, he compared himself to populist reformer Hiram Johnson — the early 20th century California governor who challenged the power of railroad barons — while he was holding meetings with wealthy donors to raise money for his campaign to transform state government. He is putting on a series of fundraisers around the state in hopes of collecting at least $50 million this year.
...
"The money is not for me. I'm not raising any money for myself," Schwarzenegger said in a radio interview this month. "It's all to go out and to be able to have TV spots and to educate the people and to let them know which way to vote and that we together can reform California."

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-money21feb21,0,5264706.story?coll=la-home-local
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. All in the California section....
so easy for people who don't read it
to not be informed about their Duckitnator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. "The money is not for me, it is to tell the people which way to vote."
You know either vote for me or the other guy. Vote for my proposals or the Democrats. Not money for me though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Combine that with Schwarzenegger's redistricting plan
and whaddaya get? A f*ck'd Golden State.

<clips>

WHAT IT WOULD DO: Take responsibility for drawing districts for the Legislature, California's delegation to the House of Representatives and the state Board of Equalization away from the Legislature and give it to a panel of five retired judges.

WHEN IT WOULD TAKE EFFECT: For 2006 elections, assuming Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger follows through on his pledge to call a special election later this year to enact his plan and voters approve it.

HOW WOULD PANEL MEMBERS BE PICKED: By lot from a pool of 25 retired judges. No more than two of the ex-judges could be from the same political party. It would take a vote of at least four panel members to approve new districts.

WHAT CRITERIA WOULD THEY USE TO DRAW DISTRICTS: Districts would have to be compact and nearly equal in population. The panel also would have to try to follow city and county boundaries and preserve "communities of interest." Other provisions would require the panel to draft as many competitive districts as possible in which the gap between Democratic and Republican voters was no more than 7 percentage points, but at the same time the legislation would bar panel members from considering voting history or party registration to reach that goal. The measure's legislative author, Assembly Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Bakersfield, said he plans to drop the 7-percentage-point standard and replace it with language that would allow the ex-judges, after trying to make districts as compact as possible, to consult voter registration figures to make minor changes that would promote competition.

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/states/california/northern_california/10944370.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laheina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. He's so full of shit.
Bet that's how his hair got that awful color.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC