Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hitler tested atomic device, German historian says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 03:52 PM
Original message
Hitler tested atomic device, German historian says
Nazi Germany was not only trying to develop nuclear weapons but actually tested atomic devices near the end of World War Two, the publisher of a yet to be released book by a German historian says.

The pre-publication claims by historian Rainer Karlsch drew headlines in German newspapers on Friday but the publisher of "Hitlers Bombe" (Hitler's Bomb) declined to give details or answer further questions until the book is launched on March 14.

Other historians played down any suggestion the Nazis were anywhere close to taking on the United States in a nuclear war.

According to the publisher, Karlsch says Nazi scientists tested "nuclear bombs" in 1944 and 1945 on the Baltic island of Ruegen and in central Germany under the supervision of the SS, but they were not ready to be deployed before the war ended.

link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. If Hitler had an atomic bomb, he would be testing it
on actual people, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aden_nak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No, he wanted the element of surprise.
Imagine if it failed? Or worse yet, was recovered by the Allies and dismantled. That could be disasterous, and while Hitler was an egomaniac concerning military strategy, he was not an utter fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. By 1944 and 1945, Germany was beyond caring about appearances..
Besides, the top German scientists were surprised when they heard about our use of the bomb...

Heisenberg and his colleagues had been completely surprised by the news that an atom bomb had been dropped on Hiroshima. Germany had no serious atom bomb program; the Germans never believed that it was possible. To cover their embarrassment at having missed this possibility, Heisenberg and friends invented the story that they had opposed the bomb project for moral reasons. Bohr was furious at this outright lie, and told Amos de Shalit that Heisenberg's message in 1941 was "You know that we are going to win this war and we will be building a new high-tech Europe based on the discoveries in quantum physics and nuclear energy. Why don't you join us?" One can imagine Bohr's feelings about being asked to participate in the building of Adolf Hitler's "thousand-year Reich" and Heisenberg's insensitivity to such feelings. The possibility of an atomic bomb was probably not even discussed, being considered irrelevant at the time.


http://www.physicstoday.org/pt/vol-54/iss-4/p14.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. The German Uranium Project (Hans Bethe in Physics Today)
<snip> When Bohr came to Los Alamos at the end of 1943, he told J. Robert Oppenheimer that Heisenberg had talked to him about an atomic bomb. Bohr reproduced frommemory a rough drawing that Heisenberg had shown him. The drawing was given to Edward Teller and me, and we immediately recognized it as a nuclear reactor with many control rods. What did Heisenberg intend to say with this drawing? Perhaps, "Look, this is what we are trying to build and you will recognize that this is a reactor, not a bomb." If so, he overestimated Bohr's knowledge of atomic power. Perhaps he was trying to get Bohr to be a messenger of conscience, and wanted Bohr to persuade the allied scientists also to refrain from working on a bomb. According to journalist Thomas Powers, this message was repeated by Wolfgang Gentner, another non-Nazi German physicist, some time later.1 But Bohr didn't understand--and neither he nor the US would have trusted the message in any case. <snip>

http://www.aip.org/pt/vol-53/iss-7/p34.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. From the same article...
Why didn't he know? Why hadn't pure intellectual curiosity led him to investigate the properties of uranium-235 with fast neutrons? He could have made a small amount using the cyclotrons available in both Paris and Copenhagen. But he never asked that these properties be measured. The best proof of his lack of interest came at the end of the war. Heisenberg and about ten other German nuclear scientists were interned at Farm Hall, a country estate in England. All of their conversations were secretly taped. When the news of the Hiroshima atomic bomb was broadcast, these scientists could not believe it. When they recognized that it was real, they asked Heisenberg how it could have been done. His first attempt at explanation was totally wrong! He hypothesized something like a nuclear reactor, with the neutrons slowed by many collisions with a moderator.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. like we did?
peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Ron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Did German scientists sabotage this?
I've read speculation in the past that some of the German scientists intentionally dragged their feet on such research, realizing the consequences of Hitler having the bomb. I'm sure it will be hard to answer this for sure, as any scientist doing this would try their hardest to keep this from being detected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bull.
Edited on Fri Mar-04-05 04:27 PM by onehandle
Hitler's atomic research was the number one target of spies and saboteurs from both sides. Their research was under the allies microscope at all times and was derailed early in the war. Germany never got close.

Just be thankful that Hitler didn't listen to his advisors. If he had waited a year or so to go on the offensive, the world might have been an even sadder place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HannibalBarca Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Indeed
A delusional leader who does not listen to his advisers or public is destined to bring his country to ruin. Hmmmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fryguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. does it matter one way or the other at this point?
seriously.....unless there's a danger that the GOP is going to use this as a way of showing that FDR was weak on preventing atomic proliferation in the 1940s in order to further their case for dismantling social security (a tactic I don't put past them to do mind you), what difference does it make in whether the Nazis split an atom or not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. As a historian I care for the sake of knowlege
it just adds food for thought to the theory that Heisenberg and others sabotaged this program...

And yes some think the Germans were "this close" to developing a nuclear device... and also this close to developing the means to deliver it to New York....

As a fiction writer it also raises questions of what would have happened IF the New York Bomber (A Heinkel bomber) actually made it to NY and delivered its nuclear payload... and there are two devices they are believed to have played with... your ever so popular dirty bomb. (Given the V-2 project this falls under terrarism) and an actual Hiroshima type device.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fryguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. as history and fiction sure....but LBN?
how does it fit into that catagory?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. If anybody wants a copy of the book making the claim,
Amazon.de is taking advance orders:

http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/3421058091/qid=1109977009/sr=2-1/ref=sr_2_11_1/302-7854247-8830432

He wrote another book with Zbynek Zeman ... where have I heard that name before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. oh, he's the last name in the phone book
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. He's a scholar of Nazi and Central European history.
Emeritus, Oxford.

Books inter alia:
Heckling Hitler, Caricatures of the Third Reich
Selling The War. Art And Propaganda In World War II
The Life of Edvard Benes, 1884-1948: Czechoslovakia in Peace and War
The Masaryks: The Making of Czechoslovakia
Pursued by a Bear: The Making and Breaking of Communist Europe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Maybe he's a long lost relative of mine? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
15. "If Hitler was close then, Al-Queda could be close now".
That is the take home meme we are expected to pick up. A fear injection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
18. There is a contrary view...
... to this. From prior reading, American scientists on the Manhattan Project had concluded that Germany was on the wrong track, in part because it chose to use more comlicated heavy water reactors to produce plutonium, rather than using simpler carbon-pile reactors.

A different history of the German atomic bomb effort is here:

http://www.prod.sandia.gov/cgi-bin/techlib/access-control.pl/2002/020307p.pdf

Additionally, there were prisoner-of-war camps in operation thirty miles or so from Peenemunde (on the northwestern tip of the island of Usedom, very close to Ruegen), and the flash from such a blast would have been very visible to prisoners in those camps (which were close enough for the prisoners to witness the contrails of V-2 launches from Peenemunde). I don't recall any testimony from prisoners suggesting something that looked like an atomic bomb blast.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC