Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gore won't run in 2008 (on Drudge but from Chris Matthews)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Nancy Waterman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 08:00 PM
Original message
Gore won't run in 2008 (on Drudge but from Chris Matthews)
FLASH: CHRIS MATTHEWS, MSNBC: The 2008 presidential campaign will not include Al Gore. I'm reporting here tonight that the former vice president and 2000 presidential nominee will not run for president in 2008. I've been given this scoop from a perfect source, I must say, who informed me that the purpose of this disclosure at this time is to end speculation about a campaign that will never occur.... Developing...

http://www.drudgereport.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AngryWhiteLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. I posted this earlier this evening, but it was moved to General Discussion
Please don't provide $$$$$ to that dickhead Drudge by clicking on the site link.

JB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. If true, who can blame him. Al wanted to be PRESIDENT
But there is no such position in Imperial Amerika. No such position at all.

Plus Amerikan "elections" have all the suspense and believability of Saddam's "elections" and Al knows a Democrat will NEVER be allowed to be Emperor and only then to preserve the pathetic illusion that Amerika is still free (and only after the Democratic Party has been reduced to full Bushevik Front Group and therefore UNDER CONTROL).

If true, I cannot blame Al as I did in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. He will eventually be found to have truly been President....check this out
Edited on Mon Mar-07-05 08:22 PM by KoKo01
Firm in Florida election fiasco earns millions from files on foreigners

Oliver Burkeman in Washington and Jo Tuckman in Mexico City
Monday May 5, 2003
The Guardian

A data-gathering company that was embroiled in the Florida 2000 election fiasco is being paid millions of dollars by the Bush administration to collect detailed personal information on the populations of foreign countries, enraging several governments who say the records may have been illegally obtained.

US government purchasing documents show that the company, ChoicePoint, received at least $11m (£6.86m) from the department of justice last year to supply data - mainly on Latin Americans - that included names and addresses, occupations, dates of birth, passport numbers and "physical description". Even tax records and blood groups are reportedly included.

Nicaraguan police have raided two offices suspected of providing the information. The revelations threaten to shatter public trust in electoral institutions, especially in Mexico, where the government has begun an investigation.

The controversy is not the first to engulf ChoicePoint. The company's subsidiary, Database Technologies, was responsible for bungling an overhaul of Florida's voter registration records, with the result that thousands of people, disproportionately black, were disenfranchised in the 2000 election. Had they been able to vote, they might have swung the state, and thus the presidency, for Al Gore, who lost in Florida by a few hundred votes.

Legal experts in the US and Mexico said ChoicePoint could be liable for prosecution if those who supplied it with the personal information could be proven to have broken local laws. That raises the possibility that any person whose data was accessible to American officials could take legal action against the US government.

"Anybody who felt they were affected by this could take the US government to court," said Julio Tellez, an expert in Mexican information legislation at the Tec de Monterrey University. "We could all do it ... We are not prepared to sell our intimacies for a fistful of dollars."


http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,949709,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sorry The Same Can't Be Said About Kerry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I would like to see Kerry run again!
I voted for Al Gore in 2000, but I am not sure I would do so again. I would however, enthusiastically support and vote for John Kerry again. I don't think people were given a honest and true picture of this great man. I have come to respect his opinions and his dedication to democratic values. I trust his good judgment. I think that is a quality we need in a president and one which is sorely lacking presently. I am sorry you have not had an opportunity to come to respect John Kerry as I have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Kerry has already proven himself unelectible
he needs to get over the 2004 election and move on.

I won't vote for him or any Dem who voted for IWR in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is a scoop? Was there a lot of speculation about Gore recently?
Has there been some push for Gore to run? Or is this just Tweety hyping himself with a scoop that doesn't seem to be much of a scoop (IMO)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. That's kind of sad actually
He was someone who I could support. Maybe a few others will materialize when the time comes. I can think of one or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpeale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. So sad, but ...
look at it this way. if the repubs overturn the 22nd amendment, bill clinton can run again! wow! i would love to see that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. I Preferred Him To Hillary or Kerry...We'll See....Don't Trust Drudge...
or Matthews...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. "I've been given this scoop from a perfect source"
Yeah, sure. The election is three years from now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. Schultz just announed this on the air, too.

I can't find a link to anything though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I just heard this on Ed Schultz as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apple_ridge Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. Two very reliable sources.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC