Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court Nominee Explains Lack of Law License

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:14 PM
Original message
Court Nominee Explains Lack of Law License
WASHINGTON - The Senate's former top lawyer, hoping for confirmation as an appeals court judge, told senators Tuesday he doesn't have a Utah law license because he never thought he needed it for his job as lawyer for Brigham Young University.
...
Griffith, who was the chamber's general counsel during President Clinton (news - web sites)'s impeachment before joining Brigham Young University as general counsel in 2003, also took the blame for losing his D.C. law license by not paying bar association dues. He got the license back by paying what he owed.
...
Sen. Patrick Leahy (news, bio, voting record) of Vermont, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, told Griffith that those two situations makes it hard for him to support his nomination to a lifetime seat on the court many consider to be one step below the Supreme Court.

"This conscious and continuous disregard of basic legal obligations is not consistent with the respect for law we should demand of lifetime appointments to the federal courts," said Leahy, who said Griffith passed up 10 opportunities to take the Utah bar exam.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=512&ncid=1278&e=1&u=/ap/20050308/ap_on_go_co/senate_judges
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, but aside from that
Good grief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. WTF?
you have to have a license to practice even if you do work for a university or whatever

this is going to be one embarrassing hearing for the Bushies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I don't think anything can embarrass the bushies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Um, the unauthorized practice of law is at least a misdemeanor
Practicing without a law license is the unauthorized practice of law.

Some qualified goobers Smirky is nominating
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. He really keeps up on those legal issues!
Sounds like a typical judge to me.... :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. A man who couldn't even keep his law license current
Is a nominee for the Federal Appellate Bench?

Are we living in Bizarro World?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. I can imagine the Utah State Bar Exam
Question 1. Are you a member of the LDS church?

If yes, skip to end and congratulations on passing.
If no, answer questions 2 - 1,213 with complete documentation in triplicate, cross-referenced and notarized for each question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Sounds like he broke the law. Alot. Shouldn't the Utah state police be
knocking on his door right about now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. Laws only apply to Democrats....republicans can do as they please
without accoutability. The only "law" the republicans recognize for themselves is that they cover one another's butts, and stay on message. The "other" laws are for people who don't belong to their inner circle.

This is the country formerly known as America.

:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC