Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Missile Defense Director Moves to End Test Glitches

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 11:32 PM
Original message
WP: Missile Defense Director Moves to End Test Glitches
Equipment Review Ordered; Admiral to Oversee Preparations

The general in charge of the Pentagon's faltering effort to develop a system for defending the United States against ballistic missile attack said yesterday that he has ordered a thorough review of all ground equipment used in testing and appointed a senior Navy officer to oversee future test preparations.

The moves by Air Force Lt. Gen. Henry A. "Trey" Obering III follow failed attempts in December and February to launch interceptor rockets in tests of the fledgling system. Both failures have been blamed on what defense officials say were minor glitches -- a flawed software code in December and a faulty silo retracting arm in February.

In a conference call with reporters, Obering expressed continued confidence in the system. He said that even without the launch of the rockets, the recent tests scored some successes by demonstrating the system's ability to track target missiles and generate intercept instructions. But he acknowledged frustration at the tendency of simple glitches to foil the tests.

(snip)

But Bush has pushed to make the system operational before it has been subjected to realistic testing, prompting complaints from congressional Democrats and many scientists that the program remains largely unproven. The Pentagon has conducted 10 flight tests since 1999, scoring five hits but under conditions markedly different from what would occur in actual attacks.



more…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21817-2005Mar9.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. By stopping the tests? That would stop the glitches!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
priller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Need to pull the plug on this money pit
It's not even close to operational, has never been subjected to anything approaching realistic conditions, and it has cost 10's of billions so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. The more glitches
the more money the contractors make. Sweet deal for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoBlue Donating Member (930 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. How naive!
a 'minor glitch', a 'flick of a switch' and all is well with our world. GMAFB!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Zanti Regent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. See what happens when the PRESIDENTIAL PRAYER TEAM don't pray enough?
Why they got to go and PRAY more for their Great Jesus-annointed President. Once they do that EVERYTHING will go right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. In the stalinist neoclown universe
All future tests will be successful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. Perhaps the General should just "order" the missile to work. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. under conditions markedly different from what would occur in actual attack
Like putting homing devices on the target missile. "OK here I am come and get me!"

Once the attacking missile went after a decoy and the said it was a success because it was close.

Another time the attacking missile didn't even get off the ground and the called it a success because it would have worked if it got off the ground.

I use to live near Vandenberg AFB and we would watch the launch of the target missiles. Then a few hours later listen to the government tell us the results. It has never worked and I doubt it ever will. It is just an excuse to funnel money to Bush's supporters just like privatization is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC