Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Collins Stewart hunts down internet libeller

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 11:17 PM
Original message
Collins Stewart hunts down internet libeller
The ability of users of internet bulletin boards to remain anonymous was placed in serious doubt yesterday after Terry Smith, chief executive of City firm Collins Stewart Tullett, won a landmark libel settlement.

Mr Smith and his firm won "substantial" damages from Jeremy Benjamin, a fund manager who posted false allegations on the Motley Fool web site using the invented web name "analyser71".

The claims were described in a high court statement yesterday as "serious allegations of criminal and dishonest financial wrongdoing by Mr Smith and the claimant companies" and "a grave slur on Mr Smith's personal and professional integrity".

Mr Benjamin, in the same court statement, said he "now accepts his serious error in publishing these libels". His claims were made in September and October 2003.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,3604,1444444,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Having been the target on a local bulletin board in the past, I think
I can understand this action even if it seems chilling to privacy online.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. ooops, double post for some reason
Edited on Thu Mar-24-05 01:12 AM by NVMojo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. Where will they draw the line on this one?
Can chimp use this ruling to close down all dissent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. More Wrinkles
There appears to be a lot of things that have yet to be settled on. Such as jurisdiction for one. An example of a case that is a new twist is as follows:

Global media giants fear chill from Toronto web libel suit

TORONTO - A libel lawsuit unfolding in Toronto could restrict how news stories are published around the world, 52 large media companies argued this week.

The lawsuit involves the Washington Post's 1997 coverage of a former United Nations official who was accused of financial and sexual improprieties on the job in West Africa.

Cheickh Bangoura, a native of Ghana who later moved from Kenya to Ontario, filed legal action against the Post in 2000 seeking $9 million Cdn. in damages.

The 46-year-old man's suit said the newspaper was hurting his reputation in his new home because Ontario residents could read the stories in the Post's web-based archives.

http://www.cbc.ca/storyview/AOL/canada/national/2005/03/09/libel-internet050309.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starwolf Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. This will lead to jurisdiction shopping
If you think you will lose in the US, go to Britain or France where the laws are more stringent. Already several cases of this have happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. public vs. non-public figures, I think.
The standards of libel and slander against public figures is different than that of private citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. Well, we can't just have people running about, willy-nilly, expressing
their opinions.

BTW, the key in all of these cases is "libel" -- in other words, malicious intent. The folks who are in trouble posted in such a place and in such as way as to personally attack (without grounds) their subjects. For instance, in the OP, Benjamin posted about Collins Stewart on the Motley Fool site (a site devoted to all things finance). If the same thing had been posted on a mommy board, for instance, it is doubtful libel would have been as easy to prove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC