Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Layoffs at tech firm? (Homeland Security contractor)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 12:10 PM
Original message
Layoffs at tech firm? (Homeland Security contractor)
http://www.dailyinterlake.com/articles/2005/03/25/news/news04.txt

excerpt:

Reports that the high-tech firm was having difficulty fulfilling all its obligations surfaced during a meeting with the Flathead County commissioners on Tuesday.


Tom Reynolds, program manager of the county's GIS department, told the commissioners that Positive Systems was awarded a $180,000 Homeland Security contract last year to provide aerial imagery of 13 populated areas across Montana, including portions of Flathead County.

<snip>

"Positive Systems went bankrupt doing this," he told the commissioners. "They laid off their entire staff about two-and-a-half weeks ago, defaulted on 14 contracts throughout the country. The employees said they hadn't been paid for the entire month of February."

<snip>

Mike Boyer, the head of Montana's Information Technology Services Division -- which includes the GIS Bureau -- said Positive Systems informed the state about two weeks ago that it was suspending operations on the remainder of the Homeland Security contract.

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
woosh Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. That isn't a lot of money for a technology project.
I'm not sure what you could get done for that scratch, actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. yeah, that was my thinking as well
Edited on Fri Mar-25-05 12:16 PM by ixion
that wouldn't even cover the cost of a couple good technicians for a year, much less satellite imaging.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Let's not jump to conclusions

We haven't seen the SOW or anything.

"aerial imaging" doesn't imply the use of satellites, and it
could be a one time baseline study. At that, given the size of
counties in the Western states, an aerial survey might or might
not be possible for a few hundred thou.

It's unlikely that some sort of periodic remote sensing project
of a land area of that size (much less a continuous imaging) would
even be undertaken for that small sum. What the local counties are
spending their "homeland security" grants on has bordered on the
insane ( everything from sending a collection of sheriffs deputies
to a seminar on terrorist threats to nuclear and large industrial
plants - from a county that DOESN'T HAVE any significant industry -
to a county buying a state of the art fire truck capable of fighting
fires on buildings up to 20 stories tall - in a county that doesn't
have a single 3 story building)... the whole thing is a complete
mess and riddled with graft and inefficiency... and $180K to do
some sort of aerial survey sounds like just another bumblefuck.

Your tax dollars at work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. okay, so forget the satellites... you're still not going to get very far
on that kind of money these days.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-26-05 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes, I was agreeing,,,,

my guess is that it's a one time aerial survey to locate trails
and such.

And that seems like both a lot of money for this (depending on
the level of detail required)... AND it is most certainly a waste
of Dept. of Homeland Security money. I'm sure that it could be better
spent elsewhere, even if it's only a down payment on a cargo container
nuke scanner.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC