Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anti-Illegitimate Births Grants Awarded

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:44 PM
Original message
Anti-Illegitimate Births Grants Awarded

WASHINGTON -- Four states, Washington D.C. and the U.S. Virgin Islands will share $100 million in federal bonuses for reducing out-of-wedlock births, the Department of Health and Human Services said Friday.

snip>

"Reducing out-of-wedlock births can have a strong, positive impact on the lives of our children, and these bonuses recognize progress toward that goal," HHS Secretary Tommy G. Thompson said.

In addition to reducing out-of-wedlock births, top states also must reduce their abortion rate.

http://www.newsday.com/news/politics/wire/sns-ap-out-of-wedlock-bonuses,0,6884048.story?coll=sns-ap-politics-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. And we'll do that with ...
Condoms? No.
Education? No ... hmmmmmmm ... I got it!

FAITH BASED INITIATIVES!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veganwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. so instead we will promote...
Edited on Fri Sep-26-03 03:49 PM by veganwitch
quick, hasty marriages that might cause undo stress and subsequent divorce on unprepared folks or promote marriage in unhealthy (physical, emotion, substance abuse) relationships.

fantastic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Not to mention pregnancies for the $$$
That is the way the US military used to work (oh I feel the flames acomin') the more dependents you had the more money you got. It was grandfathered in '91 or '92 (Poppa Bush) and then changed. Now, and anyone joining just after the change, you either have dependents or you don't. One pay rate whether you have 1 or 5 kids.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Sounds like the reason given for changing welfare
the more dependents you had the more money you got.


:) End of the day and just thought I would share the flame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Precisely! You Beat Me To It...
... the fundamentalism "ideals" behind this convoluted bit of logic continues to baffle me.

Keep in mind that these are the same folks who would rather shut down ANY clinic in a 3rd world contry that offers, or educates women about the option of terminating their pregnancy.

There are none so blind...

-- Allen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Notice it doesn't mention how they did it
Wonder how it correlates with states that do abstinence-only counselling. What do you bet there's a reverse correlation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I wouldn't be surprised
I've recently seen stats that indicate teen births decreased during the Clinton years and that wouldn't have depended on any monkeying with hocus pocus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jburton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Clinton years
Teen pregnancy went DOWN

AND

Abortion rate went DOWN

Shows what happens when you educate rather than intimidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Our country is being run by ignorant, selfish luddites with a 19th century
concept of morality....


Or you could just say... FUNDIES.

Coming to a court near you Scopes Trial Two!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Luddites? I thought they were Lutefish
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. No, they just smell like Lutefish. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. And during the 19th century there were no illegitimate
pregnancies, right? And no prostitues, no drug use, no pornography, no sex slavery, NOT. There was all of that and more!

Victorian times were very hypocritical, saying one thing and doing another. Hmmm, sounds like today in the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. We have people in office with a corrupted version of the past
that want to go back to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallydallas124 Donating Member (234 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. These folks
don't spend money unless they expect to get some type of greater return. Ever since this whole marriage initative started I've wondered what their hidden motive is. I can't imagine it's only fundie nonsense. Do married people end up paying more taxes than two single?


Anyway, my SO and I are unmarried and have a son and there
ain't a damn thing you can do about it bush & tommy :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Good for you
I hate it when the government sticks its nose in my womb

especially THOSE ugly goobers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Married people pay less taxes than two singles
but since you have a child ...that may not be the case...

Personally aside from birth control I don't know how they can change the out of wedlock birth rate and there are different variations of out of wedlock..

1. Adults who choose to have a child out of wedlock and who are able to provide for the child.

2. Children and adults who get pregnant without thinking through the consequences as well.

The positive thing is that society has embraced children born out of traditional marriage much more... when my grandmother and mother were young the children in those situations where treated like pariahs...which is horrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. If the money was to be directed towards education
and birth control and a host of programs to help people lift themselves out of poverty or even something like promoting self-esteem...I would be okay with it because out-of-wedlock births aren't a positive thing typically...

Hell I think they should help the gals out there with kids who need help as well... but then our puritan society just loves stoning the wrong-doers...

I was raised by a widowed mother...and without two parents (whether they are hetero..homo..etc) parenting is tough without some help!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
16. Backlash
This is a backlash to the decline of patricarchy. Unwed mothers, women who divorce, marry late etc. maintain their ties primarily to the mother's side of the family. The maternal family has become more and more important to women. It is referred to as a matrilinial trend. I have noticed that it is very true. The mothers offer the emotional support, and grandmothers stand up to help out, too. Fathers seem to have little to offer a woman going through a divorce or a teen pregnancy. Women band together to handle situations and crisis related to the difficult lives that might be faced in a single parent household. Both of the fathers feel excluded from the whole reproductive process, and we have a misogynistic backlash.
The only way they can operate is to use what power they have. Funny thing is, the women will outsmart them.
I picked all this up from a Helen Fisher book- "The First Sex." She puts the biolgical and environmental influences on men and women into an Anthropological perspective. It's brilliant. The best thing she's got going is this. She mentions the Mighty Menopause. One positive side of menopause is that the kids are gone. She's free and probably has some economic resources. There's an open field.
Then there's the biological factor. As estrogen decreases the small amount of testosterone that women have has potential to have some influence on their behavior. Ouch! A little facial hair. Voice may deepen a little. AND many women become more assertive.
The guys better watch out. Fisher points out that there is no telling what will happen when a bunch of menopausal women who were willing to burn their bras hit a critical mass.
Maybe we ladies will save the day. Gotta hope for something.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. ILLEGITIMATE BIRTHS
I f***ing DESPISE that term. THERE ARE NO ILLEGITIMATE BIRTHS. If the baby is HERE he/she is LEGITIMATE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
7th_Sephiroth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Damn straight man
i find that term derogatory and since this is the age of frivilous lawsuits, the the tidal wave of paperwork begin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
21. Faith-based sterilization, anyone???
These scummy guys are after grant money like maggots after rotten meat.. I predict that "poor women" will be given "special vitamin" shots in clinics, for sterilization purposes..

You know that their children are valueless anyway, ans they only cost the state money, so why not go that one step further?? The powers that be , will determine that they are "doing her a favor anyway", and if THEY get some juicy money also, where is the harm??

Look for clinics to spring up offering "free healthcare". This will bring them in, and once there, they will find out that they "need a d&c" .. These women are not the type to research or complain.. They will just notice that they are not getting pregnant anymore.. Who knows? They might actually be happier....but THEY will not be the ones getting the money..

:tinfoilhat:ish, but I cannot help thinking that this will happen.. If there is money to be made, they will find a way to get it :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC