Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some (100) 9/11 families choose lawsuits over federal fund

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 06:07 PM
Original message
Some (100) 9/11 families choose lawsuits over federal fund
Edited on Mon Jul-14-03 06:30 PM by NNN0LHI
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=676&ncid=716&e=22&u=/usatoday/20030714/ts_usatoday/5320123

The U.S. government made two promises to the families of those who died in the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks: A special Justice Department (news - web sites) fund would compensate their financial losses, and official investigations would uncover the security failures that enabled al-Qaeda to kill 3,027 people.

Uncle Sam asked one thing of the families in return: Don't drag the battered airlines and their affiliates into court. Many members of Congress wanted to avoid the sad spectacle of victims' families suing another hard-hit group.

Nearly two years later, many families of 9/11 victims are rejecting that guidance.

With the Dec. 22 deadline to apply for government payments nearing, the relatives of 1,995 deceased victims have submitted claims. The families are lining up for settlement checks that are averaging nearly $1.5 million, and they are agreeing not to sue airlines, airports, security companies or other U.S. entities that might be faulted in the fatal hijackings.

Meanwhile, with official findings of blame for the attacks slow in coming, hundreds of victims' survivors are spurning the government cash and flocking to federal courts. Undeterred by the difficulty in proving that anyone was culpably negligent -- or by roadblocks set up by Congress and the Bush administration -- the determined survivors are seeking money and facts on their own.

''Someday, please God, I will see my son again,'' says Kathleen Ashton, of Woodside, N.Y., whose son, Thomas Ashton, 21, died at the World Trade Center. ''I need to be able to look at him and say, 'Tommy, I did the right thing.' The right thing is not to take the (government) money. The right thing is to try to get answers, to see what sort of lapses allowed the murderers to do what they were able to do.''

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. good bless them and good luck
who is going to argue with a victim's red hot mother?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bushco has been counting on these families to take the
money and run. The ones who keep the pressure on for a thorough public investigation and answers are being ignored by the media. Will be interesting to see if they can finally get some airtime once the "explosive" report is released.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. In Retrospect
these settlements look more and more like "preemptive" hush money. At the time I thought it was a compassionate idea. However the bushgang doesn't have an ounce of compassion in them so that whole idea is now suspect. I think the idea was to pay off the families, stop any lawsuits, etc. I'm glad it's not working.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think the Bush administration
is stonewalling because they could have prevented the tragedy if they had paid attention to the warnings given them by the Clinton administration and intelligence from other countries. I think that intelligence was not manipulated the way Bush twisted the ingelligence about Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. GlobalFreePress.com had a story from the post attacking these peope
Check it out at globalfreepress.com

The post was mocking these families.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. Crap! They're suing Iraq! and Winning!
is this some Rovian scheme to establish a "legal" 9/11-Iraq connection?

Heaven knows I'm pleased as punch that Bush's national security record will be dragged through the civil courts. But this Iraq precedent could be trouble...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC