Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Professor untangles Iran war possibility (Rpt fm Lehigh University)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 09:25 PM
Original message
Professor untangles Iran war possibility (Rpt fm Lehigh University)
Chaim Kaufmann, professor of international relations, said if the United States were to go to war with Iran a land-based attack would not work, but he said President George W. Bush is striking a threatening pose regardless, in a speech given in Maginnes Hall on Tuesday.

Kaufmann analyzed the motivations of the United States and what the consequences would be if the United States were to go to war with Iran his speech, which was part of a series of presentations given by the international relations department in conjunction with the World Affairs Club.

Kaufmann did not offer a clear answer as to whether the United States will go to war with Iran. Instead, he discussed the possible motivations for such an attack.

Kaufmann said current governmental policy has reached an unprecedented level of intensity with Iran.

“Between December of last year and this February you get some pretty extreme rhetoric,” Kaufmann said. “President Bush in his 2005 State of the Union Address said ‘today Iran remains the world’s primary state sponsor of terror, persuing nuclear weapons, while depriving its people of the freedom they seek and deserve.’”

Kaufmann said the United States has never made similar accusations against regimes that probably deserve it more than Iran does. He also noted that this instance is the first time in which President Bush has called for the people of a country to rise up and overthrow their government. Kaufmann said he thought these peculiarities were due to the imminence of Iran acquiring fuel that would permit the creation of nuclear weapons.

Beth Konarski, ’05, asked Kaufmann for an estimation of a date when the United States would attack Iran. Konarski said that the point in time when Iran could acquire nuclear power wasn’t that far away.

<snip>

http://www.bw.lehigh.edu/story.asp?ID=18639

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thoughts as to what Dr. Kaufman's motives here might have been?
If he had any, that is? I can't exactly tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wallwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hello!? Oil!!
I'm an academic, so I appreciate an elaborate argument and presentation of evidence as much as anyone. But it's all about oil. Why delude ourselves?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Caspian basin pipeline. I remember when they started
Edited on Thu Apr-07-05 09:58 PM by alfredo
talking about building a pipeline. Iran was the big problem because of its location. Iran is in the wrong place. It is right between Iraq and the energy rich 'Stans and controls the south of the Caspian Sea Basin.


Look at a map. We are surrounding them.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Looks like there hasn't been enough killing for some people
Kevin Kirschman, ’06, said he did not think the United States would ever go to war with Iran, although he said it should.

“The world has a responsibility to prevent the further proliferation of nuclear weapons,” Kirschman said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Translation: "WE get to choose who gets nuclear power."
A bullshit argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alpharetta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Can't we just get Iraq to attack Iran?

We could make Iraq part of the "coalition of the willing".

I miss the good ole days when we supplied both sides with weapons and sat back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC