Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seoul vetoes US military plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 11:42 AM
Original message
Seoul vetoes US military plan
Seoul vetoes US military plan


April 16, 2005

The government in Seoul has vetoed a United States-South Korea combined forces plan that includes armed intervention in North Korea in the event of instability there.

The country's National Security Council (NSC) said it had ordered the classified plan to be scrapped because it could infringe on South Korean sovereignty.

Under a bilateral treaty, the South Korean military comes under American command only in times of war.

Analysts said the US military may have wanted control of South Korean forces to handle massive disruption envisaged by the potential collapse of impoverished North Korea, which has been in a standoff with the outside world for more than two years over its nuclear weapons drive.

The goal of the top secret military operation, codenamed 5029, would be to secure North Korea's nuclear weapons sites and materials.
(snip/...)

http://www.thestandard.com.hk/stdn/std/World/GD16Wd01.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Glad someone is still sane enough to "just say no"
The lunatics in the White House are driving away every ally we ever had. Add S. Korea to the list.

Now, how are we supposed to actually do anything in the region if N. Korea does fall apart? Invade S. Korea and fight them too?

This is insanity.

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. And who would decide what constituted "instability"?
Bush/PNAC of course. South Korea was wise to try to short-circuit this plan, as the N.K. nukes most likely would have fell on them (and the fallout from U.S. counter-strikes).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. That does leave an interesting question
If the government of Pakistan or NK falls, what happens to the nukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. To the victors go the spoils
Or some shit like that.

Although, in the case of the former Soviet states, the nuclear weapons didn't quite go to the victors: instead, they've gone to impoverished soldiers protecting them but whom the government couldn't actually afford to pay, who then sold the nuclear material to heaven-only-knows-who.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC