Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Private bill collectors will handle IRS tax accounts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Iterate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 04:52 PM
Original message
Private bill collectors will handle IRS tax accounts
I've been hearing for years about how the groundwork for privatization of IRS tax collection was being laid by underfunding and understaffing the IRS.

A 1996 pilot study was ended because it lost money. Nonetheless the complete implementation is now going forward.

Despite bipartisan opposition, authorization was to do this was included in the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 signed in October. It appears that Bush will not delay his use of the authority. Now the IRS will begin handing over tax accounts to private debt collection agencies for tax collection. The agencies will retain 25% of all monies collected and will handle the easiest cases.

In March, the National Treasury Employees Union was pointing out the dangers of the plan, specifically mentioning previous failures.
"Last week's indictments against former employees of the Pittsburgh-based Mellon Bank allege five men and one woman hid and then destroyed about 80,000 federal tax returns with payments to the government of more than $1 billion."

"Union: Charges cloud IRS outsourcing"
http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20050328-033349-3660r.htm

Two days ago with this headline from The Boston Herald, more groundwork:
"Study: Cheaters stiff IRS out of $300B"
http://business.bostonherald.com/businessNews/view.bg?articleid=78188

And again today from The Kansas City Star, more justification:
"Tax cheaters cost U.S. billions
Gap equals ‘surtax' of $2,695 for honest taxpayers"
http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/local/11396859.htm

Within hours Faux news was reporting its own version of the privatization story. Go find your own link on that one.

The Seattle Times has this summary from last Sunday:
"IRS getting new ally: collection agencies"
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2002236764_irs10.html

We also have an earlier DU link:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=1714464

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. IF that is done, that could be a worse infringement on rights than
almost anything we've seee so far.

I didn't read all the links in your post, but I question just how valid this is as a possibility.

There are sooo many problems with it.
1. Their tactics are a lot of times illegal.
2. They don't know the damn tax code!
3. They have no authority to collect taxes and have access to confidential information. (Yes, I know Congress could give it to them, but many people would be hysterical over that!)


I just don't see this happening!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anakin Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Sorry. It HAPPENED
in some states' tax dept. It could very well happen on the Federal level too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iterate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. That's why I included the links
and spent a couple of hours writing this. It's so fundamentally wrong, so fucked up in so many ways. I wanted to be sure, and I am.

1. The collection agencies and IRS claim IRS standards of behavior will be used. That's not very comforting.

2. They don't have to know the tax code -they will be handling the accounts for collection. I don't know how many times you've been to H&R Block with a difficult return, but if you did, you know that few of them know the code and they pretend to prepare returns.

3. They want to call this "collecting overdue accounts" but in my book that's still collecting taxes. It's not clear how much access to confidential information they will have. To me, the fact that one might owe back taxes seems like confidential information in itself, but I guess I'm just being old-fashioned. You think Equifax doesn't have confidential info? There's almost no such thing anymore.

It is happening, it's been happening. It's done, and if I had to guess, they have their sights set even higher.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-05 03:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
11.  Nominated. A ROBBER-BARON tactic, and DANGEROUS to boot.
1. Robber-baron. Do you think Bushco will hand out these contracts to their buddies? Of course.
2. Dangerous. Not only the opportunity for aggressive tactics, but wouldn't Choicepoint (for example) love to add this data to their database, AND sell this data to unscrupulous users? Can it be combined with other data (like voting records) to be politically useful? Can it be useful for blackmail purposes? You bet.

It's an excellent post, mainz_68.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iterate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-05 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Thx. I think it's critically important, dangerous as hell
This topic cuts across several issues privacy, privatization, political favors, cronyism, union busting, press manipulation, on and on. Since when did government become a money-making enterprise for some piece of shit bill collector?

It is also another predatory act that serves up the ordinary citizen on a platter. It's one more payoff for the MBNA-Debt-personal information industry, one more assault on labor unions, one more Guantanamo where rules established to protect citizens from government don't apply.

It's also been a 15-20 year project that have had the cooperation of at least a few Democrats.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. If the government is willing to give them 25 commission
Why not just offer the tax cut to the taxpayers who can't pay and negotiate the rest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. 25%?!! Was that the lowest bid? Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wait 'til you get that collection call from India.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iterate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-05 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Eventually, if they can be trained to be rude enough.
I haven't seen anything to indicate how the contracts are being awarded. And no one is admitting what the end goal is, where this all ends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Anyone remember confidentiality?
No one except the IRS is supposed to have access to any information on your tax return.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That was one of the points from my post.
Right now, the IRS employees are the only ones authorized to see your tax records.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-05 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Even if they tell the private collectors
just the amount due, that information still came from your tax return.

I am so disgusted by all the privatization. There's a reason for government. Too bad the people in government have forgotten that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iterate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. I had a thought about privacy,
but then I got to wondering, is there any info on a tax return that isn't already in a credit report? I can't think of one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MeinaShaw Donating Member (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-05 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. Does that mean we can ignore them and we will drop off the call list nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-05 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
12. Collection agencies?
Per se? Scabbers. Is there nothing this administration doesn't want to privatize?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-05 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
15. yup......dangerous, yup.........wrong
shrink the gov't to drown it tactic

Right out of the playbook
nominated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-05 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Bush's mantra is that he will only budget programs that work--he said

this reapeatedly when the budget came out. but looks like he forgot his mantra when it comes to this program!!

.....A 1996 pilot study was ended because it lost money. Nonetheless the complete implementation is now going forward.

Despite bipartisan opposition, authorization was to do this was included in the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 signed in October. It appears that Bush will not delay his use of the authority. Now the IRS will begin handing over tax accounts to private debt collection agencies for tax collection. The agencies will retain 25% of all monies collected and will handle the easiest cases.

In March, the National Treasury Employees Union was pointing out the dangers of the plan, specifically mentioning previous failures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malikshah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-05 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
18. During the Ottoman Empire, it was called Iltizam
or tax-farming...

Outsource the task to the lowest bidder, they recoup their costs etc.

One of the key symptoms of an empire on the brink of collapse.

Basic tasks cannot be completed by the government elected to the task...

Wow...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedsron2us Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 05:08 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. Tax farming was widespread in Bourbon France
just before the French revolution. When a government or state gives up control of revenue collection it is a sure sign that soon it will cease to exist at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
19. Is this another "No-Bid Contract for Halliburton?
I would bet any amount of money the firm that gets chosen is a heavy contributor to the GOP.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iterate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Plenty of little Halliburton-Eichmann shops for bushco contributions
Debt collection is one of the most heavily Republican, right wing, racist sectors. I know they put on a "professional" face, BS, but find a link and follow it until you get to the forums where people talk about life on the inside, or life on the receiving ends of their calls. Phenomenal untold injustice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-05 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. This is like Biblical times!
No, seriously.

Those of you who are up on your Bible lore know that tax collectors were one of the groups of people who were despised and whom Jesus was criticized for associating with.

The reason was that the Roman government used only private tax collectors and paid them a percentage of the taxes they collected. In those days of spotty communications and low literacy, it was easy for a tax collector to tell someone that they owed 25 shekels when they really owed 20 and to pocket not only the commission but the "unofficial" extra tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iterate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. A modern equivalent
might be the tactic of information and techno/legal overload that gets shoveled out there. It's easy, just create a system that's arcane and somewhat unpredictable. Then everyone at some point gets that feeling of being illiterate and isolated -and especially the elderly and the poor-and ends up saying at some point "Just tell me what I owe and I'll pay it.

Or they beg for a flat tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-05 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
21. BushCo is outsourcing torture again.
This time its the average Joe America that is going to get the treatment.

How long before America wakes up and realizes that BushCo has declared war on middle/working class America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iterate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Right here, another 79 yr. old deadbeat
From Ohio no less,

State going back years to collect income tax owed, often by seniors

" You could be Bernice Valek. The state's top lawyer is after the 79-year-old Parma Heights woman for a few hundred dollars in delinquent taxes dating to the Carter administration.

"Why are they after me now?" Valek asked. "I've been in this apartment building since my husband died 16 years ago, and I never heard anything from any of them until last year."

She can't prove whether she paid the taxes because she can't find the old tax returns. She asked her husband's employer for his W-2 statements but they keep them for only six years. "

http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/news/1113557460251571.xml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-05 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. That's sick and sad
Going after some poor old woman. I wonder if the tax collector will spend as much time going after corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC