Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Panel Prepare to Investigate Delay Republicans agree to ethics probe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:27 PM
Original message
House Panel Prepare to Investigate Delay Republicans agree to ethics probe
Edited on Wed Apr-20-05 02:52 PM by seemslikeadream


MSNBC


WASHINGTON - Retreating under pressure, Republicans on the House ethics committee said Wednesday they were ready to open an investigation into allegations of wrongdoing against Majority Leader Tom DeLay.

Four of the five Republicans on the committee were ready to move ahead, said Rep. Doc Hastings, the panel’s Republican chairman. The panel also has five Democratic members.

The Republicans were “prepared to vote at the earliest opportunity to empanel an investigations subcommittee to review various allegations concerning travel and other actions” by DeLay, he said.

The ethics committee has authority to start an investigation based on information it receives “through public and other sources,” Hastings said.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7575370/

edit to fix headline
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. In the House? any details?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Breaking news - details to come
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. link: GOP Ethics Members Say Will Probe DeLay
minute ago Politics - U. S. Congress


By LARRY MARGASAK, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - Retreating under pressure, Republicans on the House ethics committee said Wednesday they were ready to open an investigation into allegations of wrongdoing against Majority Leader Tom DeLay.


Four of the five Republicans on the committee were ready to move ahead, said Rep. Doc Hastings (news, bio, voting record), the panel's Republican chairman. The panel also has five Democratic members.
~snip~

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=512&ncid=1278&e=7&u=/ap/20050420/ap_on_go_co/house_ethics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. It's BOGUS - Dem's have to agree to the "new" rules to have the
investigation started. No way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wallwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Where does that info come from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. The Capitol Hill Reporter on CNN. The Ethics Committee doesn't
really exist now because they R's and D's can't agree on the rules.

Repubs want to change the rules. Dems say no. Repubs said we will start an investigation but you have to agree to the rules (which will make a party line vote clear someone).

On CNN, Ed Henry (is that his name?) said the Dems won't agree to that so we are right back where we started. This is just a ploy by the House Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #26
71. Republicans propose conditional offer to investigate DeLay
Posted on Wed, Apr. 20, 2005
BY TODD J. GILLMAN
The Dallas Morning News

WASHINGTON - (KRT) - In a game with rapidly growing stakes, Republicans raised the ante Wednesday, offering to open another investigation of Majority Leader Tom DeLay - if Democrats would drop objections to new rules that have paralyzed the House ethics committee. <snip>

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/politics/11445418.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
62. Bingo. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. It doesn't take a psychic to know the future on that one...
Tom DeLay nominated for sainthood to cheers of "Santo subito!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. About fucking time
MSNBC just sid that House Republicans had agreed to allow an Ethics Committee investigation.

Must mean they have the fix in already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
41. Hope the fix is in for deLay--or more maddog&pony show?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MeinaShaw Donating Member (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
57. About time they investigated all of them
Get DeLay. And while they are at it, get the rest of them in Congress. It is so damn corrupt. Everyone puts their relatives on the payroll, takes money for votes. No one party has a monopoly on this corruption. Anyone that thinks so is very naive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:31 PM
Original message
Ten minutes from now: "He's clean!"
the text of the 'ethics' report in full.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. LOL -- and sadly, probably true. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh yeah I expect a lot from this.
I'm pinning my hopes on the investigation in Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brokensymmetry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. Really?
Do you suppose they'll find any? Ethics of any sort, that is?

Perhaps with a microscope....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prodemsouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bah Bah - I hear a sacrificial lamb crying. The fact is most of
them are no better than Delay. Campaign Message in 2006 - "oh see we will come down hard on our own if they are corrupt -you can trust us to control everything still" wink, wink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nah-nah-nah-nah, nah-nah-nah-nah..


Hey, heeeeyyyyyy....GOODBYYYYEEEE


http://www.markfiore.com/animation/exterm.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. AP Link Here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. "Retreating under pressure..."
...begins the first line. Gotta love that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
42. Presstitutes actually using the word 'retreating'- amazing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. Sounds like to me... Republicans are running scare as '06 is approaching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prodemsouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. You got it- he is being scraficed for the campaign in 06.
Nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. Actually, this might be good news
especially if these Repubs have Rove and Cheney's blessing.

These are the same people whom DeLay threatened to de-fund if they didn't back him. You can't be de-funded by someone who is no longer there.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. Republicans said they won't change the rules though
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yep... I Want To Hear From Dem House Members As To The Validity...
of this investigation, under the current rules.

Calling Henry Waxman...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
55. Me, too , another 'cause if this is just another trick to cover Delay,...
,...it's make the Republican party smell even more stinky than they already do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
56. Exactly. The media is letting them "reframe" the issue
This is the offer dems rejected a week ago! A DeLay investigation would be the *last* one against a repub under this proposed offer.

The dems "primary objection is to a rule that would automatically dismiss cases in a tie vote — allowing either party on the evenly divided committee to stop an investigation."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amber dog democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
59. No tickee No laundry
Let the dead lock go forever.
It only embarasses the Repugs. They cant white wash someone when the "fixed" committee can't convene.
This is only getting better. They don't get it, do they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. did the unpaid, unclaimed sky box issue finally go too far?
http://beta.news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050420/ap_on_go_co/delay_skybox&printer=1

<snip> House Majority Leader Tom DeLay treated his political donors to a bird's-eye view of a Three Tenors concert from an arena skybox leased by a lobbyist now under criminal investigation.

<snip> DeLay's political action committee did not reimburse lobbyist Jack Abramoff for the May 2000 use of the skybox, instead treating it as a type of donation that didn't have to be disclosed to election regulators at the time.

<snip> The skybox donation, valued at thousands of dollars, came three weeks before DeLay also accepted a trip to Europe — including golf with Abramoff at the world-famous St. Andrews course — for himself, his wife and aides that was underwritten by some of the lobbyist's clients.

<snip> Two months after the concert and trip, DeLay voted against gambling legislation opposed by some of Abramoff's Indian tribe clients.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. Jebus. He's toast. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wallwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
21. Looked on MSNBC but did not see
the headline. Gotta wonder. Repugs investigating ethics violations would be like pigs investigating s***. They're so convered in it they don't even realize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebinTx Donating Member (389 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'm not gonna hold my breath
they'll smack him on the hand and say there's nothing to go after him for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
23. LOL !!! - A Picture Is Worth...


Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh..............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
43. LOL! o god, please save my stupid ass, love, tommy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadGimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
24. any gamblers in da house?
I got $100 that says Delay walks away from this with..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #24
45. we're liberals, none of us are dumb enough to take that bet
I know the repukes too well - they have something up their sleeves.

What odds are you giving anyways?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
25. In related news, the fox was asked to look into the loss of the chickens
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
28. AP: Ethics Panel to Open DeLay Investigation
Edited on Wed Apr-20-05 02:50 PM by Hissyspit
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGBYJI5YR7E.html

Ethics Panel to Open DeLay Investigation, Chairman Says
By Larry Margasak
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Retreating under pressure, Republicans on the House ethics committee said Wednesday they were ready to open an investigation into allegations of wrongdoing against Majority Leader Tom DeLay.
Four of the five Republicans on the committee were ready to move ahead, said Rep. Doc Hastings, the panel's Republican chairman. The panel also has five Democratic members.

The Republicans were "prepared to vote at the earliest opportunity to empanel an investigations subcommittee to review various allegations concerning travel and other actions" by DeLay, he said.

The ethics committee has authority to start an investigation based on information it receives "through public and other sources," Hastings said.

Hastings made his announcement in hopes of breaking a deadlock that has prevented the ethics panel from getting down to business for the year.

MORE AT LINK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Right
We all know that the fix is in, unless the WH called and gave instructions to get rid of Delay, sort of like they did with old Trent Lott, after his trip down racist memory lane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sidwill Donating Member (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Alternate title:
"Delay's hanpicked ethics panel, to perform dog and pony show before quietly and ever so gently slapping Delay on wrist"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Will it be a real investigation?
or simply a way to provide cover for the Hammer? We can't count on the corporate press to ask any tough questions and keep their feet to the fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. But we CAN count on Kerry, Hilary, Dean & Obama to do that...
...cant we????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. It is, in a sense, just a way to trip up the Demos, so the panel can...
"get back to business."

Right...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
34. The word must have come down from the White House.

Toss him.


Now let's watch DeLay. What will he do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. That's exactly what I think, Kaity
Edited on Wed Apr-20-05 03:22 PM by rocknation
that Rove and Cheney are exercising their OWN nuclear option.

The Republicans have nothing to gain by keeping DeLay around, especially since he's threatened to pull the funding of anyone who doesn't back him. Since he's ignored advice to address the allegations and to step aside until everything is sorted out, the Bush Oval office might the playing their trump card--the humiliation of being ousted by his own rank and file. Talk about a dead man walking!

:headbang:
rocknation

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Problem is, DeLay knows a whole lot about a whole lot,
you know what I mean?

Thing is, BugMan's not exactly the most emotionally stable
person in the world. He has a persecution complex the
size of Texas.

Lott went off quietly. But DeLay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
35. couldn't have been posted by a more appropriate person
"seems like a dream"

you can say that again, it looks great on the homepage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alizaryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
36. I'm confused
..."to empanel an investigations subcommittee to review various allegations concerning travel and other actions" by DeLay, he said."

Will this subcommittee fall under the new Repub ethics rule that after 45 days if a conclusion in regards to someone they are investigating is not arrived at its tossed out? Or will this be outside the newly created rules?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
37. I heard (From Barny Franks I think) that the new rule in the House
Ethics Committee says if they don't get a mojority ruling within 45 days, the charges just go away. That's why DeLay wanted this to go to the Ethics Commission.

If that's true, it doesn't sound like very good news to me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ktowntennesseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #37
48. Sounds like BAD news to me--here's a brief clip:
Edited on Wed Apr-20-05 04:07 PM by ktowntennesseedem
"The investigation cannot proceed unless Democrats end the stalemate over the rules. Hastings (Republican chair) called the proposal “a means by which he (DeLay) can state his case.” (from MSNBC.COM)

Agree to our rules change and we'll gladly investigate. But if you don't agree, no investigation.

No wonder the White House is standing behind Delay; they know he won't get invesigated, and they can accuse the Dems of obstructing justice to boot!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. So there can be no investigation unless....
the Democrats agree to rules that make the investigation meaningless. :eyes: A typical Resluglican ploy. There will be no game unless you abide by the rules we set, and according to the rules we set, you cannot win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ktowntennesseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #51
68. That's how I read it.
We are dealing with an enemy that operates on multiple levels of deception; things are NEVER as they first appear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piece sine Donating Member (931 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #48
74. bingo!
wecome to Washington. Dems get blamed for no ethics investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paul Dlugokencky Donating Member (409 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #37
60. Just for Show
As Sidwill noted above, this is just a dog and pony show. The latest rules allow the Republicans to block a majority ruling. They'll get to say they sent this to the ethics committee, which is making news. But it won't go anywhere. The talking point will be "the ethics committee looked into the allegations, and found there were no ethics violations. Democrats and Liberals should move on. blah blah blah..."

Does anyone actually think this could have happened without majority leader DeLay's OK?



http://www.cafepress.com/kickindemocrats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #60
78. You're exactly right! The best shot we've got is the AG in Tx.
He's outside of the Congress, and is pushing all of this, and I happen to think he's doing well.

The BS in Congress is just going to die. It might not be a bad thing though! If DeLay stays in office and in his position as Leader, WHEN he goes down in TX could be a GREAT thing for the Dems!!! Will prove all the deception!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fryguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
39. a GOP attempt to white-wash his ills?
will his "friends" really let the investigation go forward in a way that will reveal the real story, or will this be a publicity stunt designed to showcase the GOP addressing an issue but result in little more than a slap on his wrist?

bottom line, will an independent counsel be appointed? if not, this is likely to be nothing but spin . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr.Green93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
44. Woo Hoo!
We got them on the run in both Houses. We own them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #44
52. You say that in jest, correct?
We hardly, "own them". They have demonstrated that they will do anything, within and out of the law, to win. They're setting the rules for this farce, do you actually think it will be fair, if it happens at all? The Reslugs won't agree to an investigation unless the Dems agree to all of the rules changes regarding the investigation. Hence, no investigation, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ysolde Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
46. I can only dream...
that this actually means anything.

I guess I'm too cynical, but I believe like quite a few of the other posters that this is nothing more than a whitewash. The MSM won't actually ask any hard questions or push for an independent counsel. The "ethics" committee won't find anything "substantive". DeLay will get a slap on the wrist and the Repugs will say they did their job and the Dems will shrug their shoulders and say "we tried".

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ktowntennesseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-21-05 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #46
80. I'm afraid you are exactly right on this one.
By the way, a big "welcome to DU" from an equally cynical skeptic!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
47. Where is Swamp Rat?
A picture of Tom Delay, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dxstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. I'm not Rat, but... how bout this?
Tom Delay Shits Self In Middle of Senate Floor
http://www.presidentevilonline.com/sn_delayshit.html


"I feel vindicated, finally!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #50
54. That's very nice, THANKS!
maybe they'll be squashing one of their own

:hi: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mich Otter Donating Member (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
49. DeLay hand-picked the Republicans on the committee, didn't he?
These days it seems that we getting committees picked and all they do is white-wash the crimes taking place by our government officials.
How many cover-ups have we seen in Washington lately?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
53. Damn liberal conspiracy! Oh wait...
I LOVE IT!!

You're going down, Tommy-Boy!


DeLay Inc. is going to crash!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #53
58. Perception becomes reality.
No matter what the Rethugs do now regarding Delay he is tainted in the public perception. He is manure now and the Rethugs want to get rid of the stink that will wash all over the rest. That the Bush Junta is flip flopping on him indicates that they are in a Catch 22. Defending him makes them compicit. Not defending him makes them disloyal.

For Dems, the longer the stink remains the better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. If he's forced to go down before the Nuclear Option is engaged
is that better or worse for the GOP?

They could spin it as they've released the jetsam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oxbow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
63. Bad news
Now the GOP can say "see! We wanted an investigation but democrats didn't want to play ball." What a load.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
64. Good Riddance Mr Delay
I hope like hell he goes down hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angryxyouth Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. After Jr. saves his ass,
Delay will be going down on something hard, not going down hard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
65. Tom DeLay eats cockroaches
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #65
69. You're the best!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. Thanks... here's an older one:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
67. AP: "Democrats Reject Conditional Offer on DeLay Probe"
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The top Democrat on the U.S. House of Representatives ethics committee rejected a conditional offer by Republicans on Wednesday to clear the way for another probe of Majority Leader Tom DeLay, who was admonished by the panel last year on three separate matters.

Rep. Alan Mollohan of West Virginia said a Republican proposal to end a stalemate over the way investigations are conducted would undermine the ability of the panel to do its job.

"It would allow complaints to be dismissed without -- in some instances, perhaps not all -- without proper contemplation," Mollohan told a news conference.

Mollohan spoke minutes after committee chairman Doc Hastings, a Washington state Republican, said he would move to form an investigative subcommittee to "review various allegations concerning travel and other actions by Mr. DeLay" if Democrats agreed to revised changes.

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=politicsNews&storyID=8244785&src=rss/ElectionCoverage

"Republicans agree" is a ruse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paula Sims Donating Member (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #67
72. How quickly
they turn on their own and eat their young. Talk about cowards. I'm sure some will be singing to prevent themselves from becoming Noriega's girlfriend!

Paula
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
73. Woot!
Time to nail the "hammer", at last! :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cat starbuck Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
75. the Ethics hearing is a Fix.
Published on Thursday, February 3, 2005 by the Los Angeles Times

DeLay Critic Removed From Ethics Committee
Doc Hastings Replaces Joel Hefley, Who Had Rebuked the Majority Leader Three Times

by Richard Simon

WASHINGTON Ñ The House ethics committee chairman who presided over three rebukes of House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) was bounced from the job Wednesday and replaced by a Republican congressman from Washington state.

The new chairman is Rep. Doc Hastings, the committee's second-ranking Republican. He was named by House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) to take the gavel from Rep. Joel Hefley (R-Colo.).

In addition, Hastert appointed three new members to the panel, including two Ñ Reps. Lamar S. Smith (R-Texas) and Tom Cole (R-Okla.) Ñ whose political action committees have contributed to DeLay's legal defense fund. Smith's PAC contributed $5,000 in 2001 and an additional $5,000 between July and September 2004; Cole's gave $5,000 between July and September 2004.

The third new Republican member is Rep. Melissa A. Hart of Pennsylvania.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cat starbuck Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
76. Doc Hastings took Money from DeLay
Key Players in the House Ethics Mess

The Ethics Committee

The Ethics Committee, officially the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, is comprised of five Democrats and five Republicans and is the only House committee where members are evenly divided along party lines.Ê House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL) recently appointed three new Republican Members to the panel, Reps. Lamar Smith (R-TX), Tom Cole (R-OK) and Melissa Hart (R-PA).Ê They replace former Chairman Joel Hefley (R-CO) and Reps. Kenny Hulshof (R-MO), and Steven LaTourette (R-OH), all of whom voted along with their Democratic colleagues on the committee to admonish House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX) three times last year.Ê Additional Republican members of the Ethics Committee include Rep. Doc Hastings (WA), the new chairman, and Judy Biggert (IL).Ê Democratic Members include Alan Mollohan (WV), the senior ranking member, along with Stephanie Tubbs Jones (OH), Gene Green (TX), Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA), and Michael Doyle (PA).Ê Rep. Mollohan has refused to allow the committee to officially organize in the 109th Congress unless a vote is allowed on his resolution to rescind the ethics rules changes proposed by the Republican House leadership that gutted the ethics process passed in January.Ê As of March 25, the resolution had 206 cosponsors.

Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Washington: Ê Hastings is the newly appointed chairman of the Ethics Committee and is viewed by many as a party loyalist.Ê According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Hastings has received $5,930 in campaign contributions from DeLay's political action committee, Americans for a Republican Majority (ARMPAC).Ê Mollohan's resolution is awaiting action in the House Subcommittee on Rules and Organization of the House; the committee chair is Doc Hastings.Ê Hastings has not said whether he will recuse himself in the matter.

http://www.commoncause.org/site/pp.asp?c=dkLNK1MQIwG&b=477137
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karma Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
77. It's a bit too late for Republicans to pretend they have ethics...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-21-05 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
79. Refuse the ground rules!
Keeping Delay on will probably only strengten the democrats in the long run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LatePeriduct Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
81. How about he just look like a broadsided fool!
And keep the pressure cooking heater on his ass until the freepers eat him alive and spit him out like afterdone stew.....

http://houseofscandal.org

Begin the cannibalism and watch the show!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LatePeriduct Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-05 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
82. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC