Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Votes to Reverse GOP Ethics Rules

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 08:22 PM
Original message
House Votes to Reverse GOP Ethics Rules
1 minute ago Politics - U. S. Congress


By LARRY MARGASAK, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - The House, with grudging Republican support, voted Wednesday to reverse GOP ethics rules that Democrats charged were designed to protect Majority Leader Tom DeLay.


The Republicans heeded Speaker Dennis Hastert's call for a retreat to end a deadlock that has kept the evenly divided ethics panel from functioning. The vote was 406-20, with all votes against the resolution cast by Republicans.


An early job for the committee may be an inquiry into whether a lobbyist financed DeLay's foreign trips in violation of House rules. The majority leader has asked to appear before the panel to clear his name, and told reporters Wednesday he was pulling together travel records going back a decade.


In debate, Democrats continued to attack DeLay's conduct. Republicans countered that they didn't make a mistake but accepted political reality: In a committee with five members of each party, Democrats would not supply any votes to let the committee operate without a reversal of the rules.

~snip~

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&e=1&u=/ap/20050428/ap_on_go_co/ethics_committee&sid=84439559
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Stupid from start to finish.
Lovely PR it got them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Things haven't gone too well for the Rethuglicans ...
since the election, have they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. a headline like "Repub. Ethics comm. Flip-Flops"---I got so so tired of
the repugs saying that phrase during the campaign!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hopein08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. I was watching but I have one question...
who was the Republican that voted present?

DeLay? Hastert?

Anybody got a link to the vote tally?

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. When the Republicans took total control of the Executive Branch
and the Legislative Branch, Delay remarked "now Republicans can do things they have only DREAMED about." He was not kidding.

This "lust" (as Gore has just termed it, and I do love the way he incorporated that word "lust" into his speech) has propelled them to reach for the Judiciary as well.

There remains no disguise, no pretense, no mask for what these extremists are attempting to do ... and the moderate Republicans were simply foolish for allowing this small minority within their party to behave so radically. After all, it's not just their party this overreaching could destroy, it's our entire country. And they, as well as we, must live here too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimbot Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Is it just me?
...or does something smell.
The vote was 406-20. I'm surprised the repubs in the house didn't stick up for their guy. My guess is that many of them know one of two things.
1. Something even bigger will come out forcing him to step down.
...or...
2. Nothing else will come out and he will continue on without even a slap on the wrist.

I'm just shocked at the number 406-20. If it were a closer vote, I wouldn't be as suspicious.

--JT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On Par Donating Member (912 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Can You Say "Mid-Term" Elections?
The poll numbers were stinking out the Republicans on the Ethics committee new rules, and Delay's arrogance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimbot Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. If it were closer
I'd lend more credence to the midterm elections...but that much of a change makes me wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. Something smells really bad...
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. kick to combine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seeing Red Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. House Overturns New Ethics Rule as Republican Leadership Yields
Edited on Thu Apr-28-05 02:03 PM by Seeing Red
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/28/politics/28ethics.html?th&emc=th">http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/28/politics/28ethics.html?th&emc=th

"WASHINGTON, April 27 - In a rare retreat, the Republican-led House on Wednesday overturned contentious rule changes made to the House ethics process, with Republicans saying they surrendered to the Democrats to try to restore a way to enforce proper conduct in the House.

'I am willing to step back,' said Speaker J. Dennis Hastert of Illinois"

-snip-

"One of the most immediate effects of the House's reverting to the old rules will be the opening of an investigation into persistent questions about Mr. DeLay's overseas travel and his relationships with prominent lobbyists. His fund-raising operations are under investigation by a grand jury in Texas, and some of the lobbyists' roles have come under increasing scrutiny by federal investigators in recent months."

looks like they're finally coming around ...

NAIL the hammer!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Ok Tom DeLay, you have 24 hrs. to resign or you will be....
...impeached by the house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Thanks, Tom...we've got some lovely parting gifts for you, too...
Man, if that ain't a kiss-off, I don't know what is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC