Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ship en route to Iran tests WMD proliferation deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 10:52 AM
Original message
Ship en route to Iran tests WMD proliferation deal
http://www.swissinfo.org/sen/swissinfo.html?siteSect=143&sid=5732030&cKey=1114701634000

BERLIN (Reuters) - A German crane on a ship to Iran is testing a U.S.-led global agreement to combat the spread of weapons of mass destruction.

Three weeks after the ship left Hamburg and a day before it was due in Iran, it appeared unlikely that Germany or the U.S. navy could stop the crane being delivered to what Berlin has belatedly identified as a blacklisted Iranian company suspected of making ballistic missiles.

A Western diplomat said Washington was closely following the case as a test for its Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI).

That accord was unveiled by President George W. Bush in 2003 as a collective global effort to stop "shipments of weapons of mass destruction, their delivery systems, and related materials worldwide."

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. My,isn't this just redolent of Cuba, October 1961?
Edited on Thu Apr-28-05 11:02 AM by leveymg
Only a German crane isn't a Russian ballistic missile. Won't stop them from trying to evoke the imagery, however. Will we see Bolton in his initial role before the UN with a pointer and charts playing Adlai Stevenson?

The thought is almost Dr. Strangelove funny, if we weren't really headed for a major war in the Middle East.

:bounce: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :dunce: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, that popped up in my mind too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's just a trial balloon for the Russian nuclear rods that are scheduled
to arrive in Iran at the end of June.

The options narrow for Sharon, if he's serious that the Bushehr(say that word aloud) reactor will never go critical.

My guess (hope) is that the Russians will blink, and some new technical or contract difficulty arises to further delay delivery. Of course, that leaves all those underground centrifuges still spinning separating out the weapons grade uranium. Those are the real targets of all those new bunker busters we've been shipping to the Israeli Air Force.

One way or the other, this is going critical.

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I doubt it actually, I think this is bluster.
But you never know with these loons.
I'd like to hear what Pooty-Poot had to say to Sharon
on the subject of Iran in private, but I don't expect to
be so lucky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think Sharon is fully capable of pulling the pin.
He has a lot of blood on his hands, Israeli as well as Palestinian. Tbe Iranians lost a million or more in the war with Iraq - they're blooded as well. I think the central players aren't bluffing.

I hope like hell I'm wrong about this. I'd be really happy, in fact, if this goes away, and Bush and Putin come off as shrewd peacemakers, a la Kennedy and Krushchev.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Oh, I'm not saying he wouldn't, Osirak makes that clear enough. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC