Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush adviser Hughes says leak disrupts democracy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 11:39 PM
Original message
Bush adviser Hughes says leak disrupts democracy
Edited on Wed Oct-01-03 11:39 PM by khephra
By CLAY ROBISON

Copyright 2003 Houston Chronicle Austin Bureau

AUSTIN -- Karen Hughes, one of President Bush's longest-serving and closest advisers, said Wednesday that the public disclosure of a CIA operative's name was a disservice to the president and "very disruptive to democracy."

Hughes said she was confident that her fellow Texan and sometime rival, Karl Rove, the president's chief political adviser, didn't leak the name to a syndicated columnist because "Karl has said that he was not involved."

snip.........


"President Bush has said -- and I agree -- there are too many leaks in Washington. We didn't experience that kind of situation when we were here in Texas. I think it's very disruptive to democracy," Hughes said.

"Whoever did this leak obviously was not serving President Bush very well," she added.

more..............

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/metropolitan/2132208
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Boo Freakin' Hoo! & bushit, too!
they wouldn't know Democracy if it bit them in their colletive asses.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. She knows he didn't do it himself, at least.
Because she knows Scooter Libby did it. Rove gave the whole thing the OK (along with Hughes and others in the WHIG group), but he didn't actually make the call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TXDemGal Donating Member (600 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Spin, spin, spin
Edited on Wed Oct-01-03 11:46 PM by cheryl_d
It's really rich that a water carrier for Bush* would say the leak disrupts democracy. These fuckers wouldn't know democracy if it bit them in their rosy red asses. Not only that, but they're spinning as if the issue is the "leak" rather than about the fact that the traitor(s) broke federal law and put an agent and her sources in danger.

These people make me ill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. probably also disruptive
to Valerie Plame's network of informants and their families - some of them are probably be tortured right now for being informants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Certainly she meant to say the "Leak disrupts their Tyrranny"
Friggin Fascist!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drscm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Poor Bushies...Asking for the truth is disruptive to their monarchy. eom
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. getting caught didn't serve Bush well
or making the mistake of picking on a guy that stood up to him didn't serve Bush well.

If they got away with it, it would have exactly served Bush just the way Rove intended it to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Outing CIA agents undermines our national security, post 9-11
and it's against federal law. What about the rule of law, Karen? Remember that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. thats RIGHT - AND puts ALL AMERICANS AT RISK! HANG'EM HIGH!
:evilgrin:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
10. Karen thinks Karl did it
Karen and Karl don't get along very well and I'm sure she won't be too disappointed if he takes the hit. I'm reading more in between the lines.

(snip)
"Whoever did this leak obviously was not serving President Bush very well," she added.
(/snip)
Get the hint Karl, stand aside for the good of the bu$h presidency is what I think she is saying.

Of course she has to say she doesn't think the little bastard did it.
(snip)
"Karl has said that he was not involved."
(/snip)

Yeah the whole "disruptive to democracy" whine coming from one of the 2000 coup leaders is not very believable. Sure the bushies believe in democracy, if they control it.

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
11. Excuse me...SHES WORRIED SOMEONES NOT SERVING BUSH WELL????
Why doesnt Ms. Hughes pull her head out and look at WHO ELSE THIS DIDNT SERVE WELL. Namely the Wilson family and Americans AT LARGE.

That is one of the sickest, most demented statements I have yet to hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado_ufo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
24. Notice that this is the sentiment over and over?
"Serving Bush well" - Every statement is firmly entrenched with this attitude. Whatever happened to serving our COUNTRY? With serving the PEOPLE?

If you look even casually at their statements - on any matter - you would think that they are serving a monarchy. I expect any day now that * will decline to be addressed as "Mr. President" and will instead demand to be addressed as "America."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Life would be easier if he was dictator.
Then he wouldn't have to resort to smearing people...he culd order them held in a prison, just like all those RW dictators used to do to the opposition in South America...the ones Poppy helped to destroy Democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. I think you're seeing another coordinated talking point at work.
I've noticed NUMEROUS bush apologists and other assorted repukes very deftly commenting about how this has "dragged the president into..." or "doesn't serve the president very well" or some such wording, to put bush in the PASSIVE MODE rather than active. This is a subtle technique for planting the impression that bush was separate from this and it's being done TO him, not BY him or with his knowledge or authorization.

If the repukes learned anything from Watergate (and I'm betting they did), it's to build up better and stronger plausible deniability. Note also, she says things to suggest that KKKarl says he didn't do it and to lend the impression that it was somebody else. Another post her caught that inference, too - that suggests if KKKarl didn't do it PERSONALLY, he engineered it for others to do, so he could CLAIM he didn't do it.

Even so, it still has his fingerprints all over it. It's the kind of mean-spirited, shitty thing he's known for, and has been known for, for a LONG time, and he HAS, in the past, used Robert Novak as his tidbit drop. There's a pattern here that's just a little too obvious. Sorry Karen. Try again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fizzana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
12. They disrupt Democracy every waking minute.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. UUUUU the poor things, just had to resort to getting KAREN to say
a few words to defend the Shrub.

She knows, Rove knows, Bush knows, they all know.

But the stonewall is cracking.... and they know that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #14
32. Now's the time to CALL YOUR CONGRESS-CRITTER!
The TOLL FREE CAPITOL HILL SWITCHBOARD NUMBERS:

1 (800) 839 - 5276

1 (800) 648 - 3516

Call 'em up, first thing in the morning, and they'll switch you to anybody's office you name.

Also: www.congress.org - for the directory to anybody's office, either on the Hill OR locally, phone numbers, AND FAX numbers.

Also: for good measure:

CNN: 1 (404) 827 - 1500

THESE PEOPLE NEED TO BE REMINDED THAT THIS IS MORE THAN JUST A LEAK. WE'RE TALKING POTENTIAL TREASON!!!!!!!!!!!

Let's call it what it is. If this were in the Clinton White House, THEY certainly would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
E_Zapata Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. What democracy?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doug Decker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
13. I thought Karen went to Texas to be with her son...
and husband. Wasn't there a big "Repuke Values" send off for her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
41. She left only for a week or so
then it was announced (but barely covered) that she was coming back, working at the White House every other week, but maintaining her home in Texas. She hasn't gone anywhere. She writes his speeches, gives him massages, and right now is accompanying the missus in Europe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
15. Memo to Karen: The Bush administration is disruptive to democracy
Edited on Thu Oct-02-03 12:21 AM by nothingshocksmeanymo
To ant lurking CIA agenst...please take this line and RUN WITH IT!!!


Look out...they wanna move the White House to Texas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
16. Murdering innocent people and having your soldiers die for a lie or for
oil. What does that do to Democracy? And what does every country in the world knows this and dislikes the US for it. What does that do for world democracy and the US setting an example for the world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
17. Disservice to the King. That's what I hear when these people say president
Because they treat this guy like he was our King. King George. Republicans long for the days of a king to bow down to, I think. These guys are the political decendents of the Tories and Royalists who opposed the patriots during our Revolutionary War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
18. ...but....but....but....it's gonna disrupt the PNAC's agenda.......
....isn't that what you meant to say Karen. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
19. This is getting interesting!
I just heard Larry Johnson (I believe that's his name) say it was Scooter Libbey. He was the former CIA operative who was on PBS loudly putting down this administration for its outing of Plame. This was another appearance on Press & Buchanan on MSNBC.

Looks like the fall guy or guys will be Cheney and Libbey. Since it has been said on here that Cheney will go down and be taken off the ticket, this seems mighty convenient. I'm a tad suspicious. I'd rather it was Rove. Don't understand, unless it was both Rove and Libbey, since Wilson has outed Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whirlygigspin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. who cares
what Karen "Lewinski" Hughes says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado_ufo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. I thought Johnson had put the finger on Rove
previously?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
E_Zapata Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
21. How the hell can she say who didn't do it, unless she knows who did?
Edited on Thu Oct-02-03 01:19 AM by E_Zapata
And, if so, why not spill it, Karen? Save democracy you ass sucking witch - and let us know who it was and we can move on the business of having our elections stolen. ahhh, the good old days of democracy in the usa.

I absolutely hate these fuckers tonight. More than I do normally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
23. "We didn't experience that kind of situation in Texas".
...hmmmm I wonder why not? Maybe Ole Bush would "take care of them", like he promised to do with the senior blabbers in the White House.

"Texas style?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
27. Who's next on the agenda?
James Baker or Henry Kissinger or daddy pooper?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leetrisck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
28. "A disservice to the president" -
Is getting people killed a "disservice to the president?" This is treason - to hell with the Slim Shrub in "our house"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
29. Lies and the Lying Liars That Tell Them
You know, I'll bet if you'd asked Eichmann whether he was heading a industrial Jew-murdering operation, he'd have said "no", too.

Which, of course, means he didn't do it.

:puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
30. So, a known liar is vouching for the truthfulness of another liar while...
...serving the interests of the Liar-in-Chief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
33. there's "man's" law & that other kind which inconveniences us occasionally
also called God's or Natural Law.

i wonder what hughes take is on the Pentagon Papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
34. What an arrogant and delusional statement.
Providing the public with information is "very disruptive to democracy."

These people are mad. Angry too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
35. Why does the media start pointing at administration officials?
Bush is the President. I don't care whether it was Rumsfeld, Cheney, Rice, or whoever- Bush is the President, and he's accountable for the actions taken by his administration.

Isn't it strange that Bush, like Reagan, is just assumed to be an incompetent boob with no real involvement in anything? Allowing staff to commit crimes... hiring traitorous criminals to do this sort of vindictive work... that's just as bad as doing it yourself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scipan Donating Member (374 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
36. leak, leak, leak
Change the terms of the issue and you change the way people perceive the issue. The repukes are so good at this.

I will never use the word "leak" for this -- someone in the WH OUTED A CIA AGENT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ByeDick Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
37. DICK CHENEY Is The Leak **BREAKING NEWS**
Regarding the Wilson intelligence scandal:

We need to realize that EVERYTHING Bush, Novak, and McClellan are SAYING is absolutely true. But everything they're TELLING US is a lie. We have to remember to listen carefully to the exact words.

Novak originally said that the information about Wilson's wife came from, "two senior administration officials." THIS IS TRUE.

Novak also says that, "Nobody in the Bush administration called me to leak this." THIS IS ALSO TRUE.

There is ONE MAN in the world who is BOTH a senior administration official, and does not release information from the administration (from the White House).

There is ONE MAN in the world who invested his reputation and resources to the Niger yellowcake story, more than any other.

There was ONE MAN in the world who knew of Wilson's trip to Niger as well as he knew about the identity of Wilson's wife.

THE MAN'S NAME IS **DICK CHENEY**.

The yellowcake story was Cheney's baby.

Joseph Wilson killed Dick Cheney's baby.

So, when Scott McClellan talks about how "ridiculous" it is that the leak could have come out of Karl Rove, it's because he knows this statement to be true. Rove IS NOT the one who ORIGINALLY released this information. There is no way this could have been the case because there's really no scenario that would explain how Rove could legitimately be in possession of this information. But Rove is a part of the conspiracy, all the same.

The plan was for Cheney & Novak to make the info about Wilson's wife "common knowledge around Washington." That was the first wave of the attack. The second wave was initiated when Cheney told Rove that he (Cheney or his office) had put Wilson's wife's identity in print, and that she, and her identity, were now, "FAIR GAME." The rest was left to Rove. Rove, or people working with Rove, then made the FAIR GAME phone calls to the media, knowing that Cheney & Novak had laid the groundwork to cover their asses (legally) by making the secret information, "common knowledge around Washington."

The White House is trying to convince us that the Novak disclosure and the "FAIR GAME" phone calls were taking place as one continuous event, but they were not. The Novak crimes (disclosures) were designed to set up the FAIR GAME phone calls from Rove. This was a two-point plan. Novak is working with the White House on this. He is knowingly trying to mislead any would-be investigations and may eventually go down for this obvious obstruction (at least).

Scott McClellan completed the second wave on Wednesday. When asked to make a distinction between disclosing the identity of a covert CIA operative and discussing it after it is published, McClellan said, ""That is such a broad question, about is it OK to discuss news articles," he said. "I mean, news articles are discussed all the time."

So, is there one top-level White House official whose email, phone records, etc. ARE NOT being protected by orders of the Justice Department? Is their one top-level White House official who does not work in the White House and whose staff is not under evidence protection orders or legal scrutiny? Is Cheney watching and laughing?

Cheney is the only top level White House official who DID NOT go before cameras this week to talk about everything he doesn't know. Dick Cheney won't be seen any time soon.

When they (McClellan & co.) say, "White House," they're actually saying, "THE PLACE WHERE CHENEY IS NOT." Notice how often they use the terminology "White House." And when Novak uses the word "identity," in talking about Valerie Plame, he's not talking about her job at the CIA, he's talking about her "identity" as Wilson's wife. It's a word game. The words are true; the message is a lie.

LISTEN TO THE WORDS THEY USE.

All of the information above is classified...For now.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Nice. Great points. And welcome to DU!
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myomy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
39. Right and KKKRove has a big bowl of ethics for breakfast.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
40. Oh Karen!
Don't you have some tea party to go to or something? Go bake some cookies. Better yet, fetch me a beer lamb chop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlcandie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. * will come out smelling like a rose.. just wait and see!
All the women are pandering to him... Stepford wife Laura, now Karen, Condi protects him like a hawk. Didn't you see his innocent <deer caught in headlights> look from someone's post the other day?

He will be seen as squeaky clean, virtuous, Christianly...yada yada yada. We are hearing it already. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC