Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Cocaine Users Face Greater Risk of Aneurysm

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:16 PM
Original message
NYT: Cocaine Users Face Greater Risk of Aneurysm
Cocaine Users Face Greater Risk of Aneurysm
By LAWRENCE K. ALTMAN
Published: May 10, 2005


Cocaine users face a newly discovered and possibly fatal risk: coronary aneurysms, a ballooning of the walls of coronary arteries. The condition increases the chance of suffering a heart attack, even years after users stop the drug, researchers in Minnesota are reporting.

The risk of developing an aneurysm was four times as high among cocaine users in their mid-40's as among nonusers in the same age group, according to the study, reported yesterday in the journal Circulation, which is published by the American Heart Association.

Aneurysms occurred in 30.4 percent of cocaine users in the study compared with 7.6 percent of non-users.

Precisely how much cocaine is needed to produce the aneurysms is not known, but the frequency of use was clearly linked to development of aneurysms, said Dr. Timothy D. Henry, a co-author of the study.

"The risk was definitely more common in people who used cocaine at least once a week," said Dr. Henry, who directs research at the Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation at Abbott Northwestern Hospital....


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/10/health/10coca.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MirrorAshes Donating Member (942 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. wow
Aneurysms occurred in 30.4 percent of cocaine users in the study compared with 7.6 percent of non-users.

Thats pretty serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. but it's POT that the DEA is targeting even harder now
'coz pot is a hippie drug and coke a preppie drug.
This also explains a lot about Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MirrorAshes Donating Member (942 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hah! Yeah...surprised he didn't keel right over in the debates.
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Somebody should email this to Ann Coulter
poor thing...

She's in obvious danger!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firefox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why would anyone believe anything a "researcher" says
Edited on Mon May-09-05 11:28 PM by firefox
You can immediately discount any research funded by the USG as there is a terrific search for any possible "harm" from the use of illegal drugs. I still think the CIA needs to get out of the drug trade though.

How about researching the chemicals in the environment and instead of drug testing how about testing "the children" for heavy metals like mercury?

Just look at the way the drug warriors heaped on harm with their onerous laws when Len Bias died the day after using cocaine with the coroner not attributing his death to cocaine. Freud used cocaine his whole life and heroin does not intrinsically kill. Problems come from a black market where quality is not assured and financial burdens cause unsafe use and a criminal justice solution that prevents people from coming forward for health treatment of their addiction.

At least the article did not use the "may cause" strategy of the drug warriors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baby_bear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Your information is incorrect, firefox
And I hope people won't heed it.

As a toxicologist, I agree with the information about the cardiac danger of cocaine. I used to be skeptical, but the scientific information now available is irrefutable, Freud's experience notwithstanding.

I agree that the government is ignoring a lot of tox information for a number of chemicals, but in the case of mercury, it is about its effects on the cardiovascular systems of adults, not children. Mercury is just as bad for adults as it is for kids, although it has different effects.

b_b


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firefox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. So what statement is incorrect?
That you cannot just accept "research" as fact or that prohibition has problems including zealotry. As far as mercury I put up a thread concerning a good article on mercury last week- http://tinyurl.com/ds8la
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEIL PRESIDENT GOD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. Freud gave up coke in the 1880s
He thought it was great until he saw a friend get addicted.

I'm for legalization of all drugs and even disarming all local police. But I don't like cocaine, and I don't like what it does to people. After legalization I would continue to help people stop using coke, heroin, and speed.

But I feel the same way about high fructose corn syrup, which for some reason is legal in human food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. To judge from POTUS, coke users are also at higher risk of
... jibbering nonsense
... sprouting square bumps beneath their jackets (during debates)
... starting unnecessary international conflicts
... pulling equine genitals and rubbing bald heads

America's children should notice and learn the lesson ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Good one! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEIL PRESIDENT GOD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. "coke users are at a higher risk
of gibbering nonsense"

Doesn't everyone who has been to a party since about 1971 know this for a fact?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. That explains the smirk on Dubyaas mug. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. Well thats it then. No more crack for me n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberallyInclined Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
10. well...i guess i've done my last line.
and that was 10 years ago.

my uncle had a brain anuerysm that burst- luckily it was while he was on the operating table for it...lucky- except that it left him brain-damaged, and generally in a childlike state, mentally for the rest of the next 30 years of his life...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
11. but, but....what if you only did a lot of it for a very short time?
and quit like 20 years ago?

just kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinanator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. Cancer WILL claim them if nothing else does
Edited on Tue May-10-05 08:52 AM by tinanator
and it doesnt take a jet fuel scientist to figure that out once you have seen what is happening to older victims of GHWB's 80's drug policy. My uncle is dying, right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
16. I don't think this comes as much of a surprise to many people
We've known for a while that it causes strokes, and "mini-strokes". It obviously affects blood vessels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC