Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Retired carrier USS America sunk off U.S.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:44 PM
Original message
Retired carrier USS America sunk off U.S.
May 20, 2005

NEWPORT NEWS, Va. (AP) -- The retired aircraft carrier USS America is on the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean, sunk by the Navy in a series of explosive tests that upset some veterans.

The 84,000-ton, 1,048-foot warship that served the Navy for 32 years rests about 60 miles off the coast and more than 6,000 feet down, according to Pat Dolan, a spokeswoman for Naval Sea Systems Command.

<snip>

No warship this size or larger had ever been sunk, and plans to sink the America caused controversy.

"Not a day goes by that I don't think about it," said Lee McNulty, president of the USS America Foundation, which wanted to turn the ship into a museum. "Of all the carriers, that one should have been saved, just for the name America."

http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CARRIER_SUNK?SITE=FLPET&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2005-05-20-20-47-03

Somehow it seems appropriate that America was sunk.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. This pisses me off
had the sunk it in shadow water for people to go see, I could understand that but 6000 feet down....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Would secrets
about it's construction and armor be an issue?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. it was non-nuclear so I do not think so nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Armor? We don't do armor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. Nope....
they strip them before they sink them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. No.
Most armor on ships that were made that far back is just plain steel.

Besides, 6,000 feet isn't untouchable for some submarines. The U.S. would have been better off stripping it into scrap metal if they were worried about technology leaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. scrap metal
they turned my boat into razor blades

what a waste :crazy:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
31. They wanted to hide the knowledge on how to sink carriers.
If you read the article, she was used for weapons tests to verify how she would stand up to real weapons. The Navy will use this data to improve the design of future carriers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Conservativesux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Is there a possible cover up reason for this. Why not salvage it?
I dont know much about ships but this seems sort of strange to me.

Anyone with naval/military knowledge of sinking old ships like this have any ideas about this one ?

Q: Possibly they sunk something else, along with the ship???


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lenidog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. The salvage yard probably couldn't make any money off of it
Since it was an older ship there is probably tons of asbestos in it. Just removing the asbestos would probably cost more than any money the salvage yard would make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #14
29. not environmentally friendly idea to say the least
but, it's PROFIT over EVERYTHING these days :crazy:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. good lord
you are right....perhaps this was symbolic on their part. america goes down hardly a word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susanna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. First thing I thought...
...and the first I had heard of it. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bush sinks America
Edited on Fri May-20-05 09:54 PM by SpiralHawk
Meanwhile, the S.S. ChimPee oil-powered scow steams along, leading the nation into the planetary sewer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. I hope it makes a good
Edited on Fri May-20-05 09:56 PM by burrowowl
isle of fish shell etc. build up. To make a reef maybe they should have sunk it in a lower latitdue, I don't know.
Or would it have been bee better to sell it as scrape metal.

Woops I didn't see the 6000 ft. Wonder what is down there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Has the Navy ever heard of recycling?...
...just asking? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
retnavyliberal Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. I decommissioned her when I was in the Navy...
And I am kinna sad about seeing her go this way. They Moth-balled her for several years, but we all knew that she would end up scrapped. The ship never had a full over-haul. It was in very very bad disrepair. We kept her together for a long long time but it would have cost a fortune to fix and was not worth much to scrap. My guess is they wanted to run some tests for damage control studies or something like that.

On a separate note, when they decommissioned America, they had on the drawing board and may have started building CVN-76 and it was to be named the USS United States. Flagship to replace the Flagship. Well, somehow *cough* Congress got the Navy to change the name to the Ronald Reagan. I am still pissed on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
36. I was on the Forrestal...
when were you in the navy?

I got out in '86

OS 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why the hell did they do this????
Edited on Fri May-20-05 09:57 PM by wicket
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. There were several reasons
Nobody has ever sunk with munitions before. All models of this kind of damage has been hypothetical. This helped verify the numbers.

I believe the reason for the depth is the fact that the USS America is over 1000 ft. long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lenidog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Because they no longer can use it
the aircraft have gotten to big, its too old to refurbish and no one wanted to scrap it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. It might be a way to get rid of chemical weapons, nuclear waste, etc.
Otherwise, you would think it would have went for scrap, or an artificial reef.

Or, they may just have wanted to keep all its secrets secret.

Steel is supposed to be pretty expensive now, though, so the scrap value would not have been inconsiderable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lenidog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. You have to balance the cost of scrapping it with disposing of all
the crap like asbestos that the ship was built with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Asbestos disposal is a good point.
Although many might point out that the ocean shouldn't be an asbestos dumping ground. I don't know if it would be a problem in deep cold water though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lenidog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. I remember reading an article about a small salvage company
that managed to buy one of our diesel subs for scrapping and ended up going bankrupt because they realized that there was tons of asbestos on board the sub. They neither had the ability or or the money to get rid of it legally. So the sub is still sitting there in the yard half dismantled and everyone is trying to either decide whose problem it is or avoid making it their problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. They disposed of...
*Shrub's incrimintating military and business records.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. Impossible, it was only 1,048 feet long...(eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. I would have had a better use for the thing
Anchor it in international waters and declare it a sovereign nation.

For example:

The Principality of Sealand
Official website of the Government of Sealand.
http://www.sealandgov.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demonaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. RIP America, many a sailors stories will carry her memory fo a long while
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
24. Hooboy, I sure don't like the symbolism of that.
I sure don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Castilleja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
26. What is this, an omen??
or what...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olddad56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
27. a slap in the face to all who served aboard her.....
Being in the Navy is a funny thing. You bitch about it everyday, you have more adventure than you will the rest of your life and you love it, but you bitch and complain about it every day (sort of like golf). Then you get out, the years go by and you realize that you just won't ever make friends like you did in the Navy. The ships we served on become immortal, larger than life. We join associations dedicated to the preservation of our memories. I belong to one association related just to the type of aircraft I flew in (A3 Skywarrior) and another dedicated to the squadron that I'm so very proud to have been part of (VQ-1). We had planes that trapped aboard the America in the Gulf of Tonkin. A carrier such as the America carries 5000 people. I'll bet that over the years, a few hundred thousand proud, courageous young men served aboard the America, either as ships company or as a member of a squadron assigned to her. The America holds memories for more people than can ever be counted. Had they had the sense to make her into a aviation museum as they have with so many other retired carriers, she could have served as first rate tourist attraction. But, alas, she is buried at sea. Not a fitting final resting place for a ship that meant so much to so many. So many, that served this country back when it was still a proud democracy. Maybe it is fitting that a ship named 'America' should sink as our government sinks to new lows everyday. Fuck fascism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. Oh, I dunno.
Hubby served aboard the USS Spiegel Grove in the late 60s. LSD-32, as I recall, but I could be mistaken. Nothing fancy or exciting like a carrier, just a troop landing ship.

The navy sank it a couple years ago off the coast of Florida. Didn't do as good a job as with the America, because the Spiegel Grove refused to sink. Made the news. Eventually, they got it to go down, where it is now an artificial reef.

Hubby got a good laugh out of it, thought at least now it's doing something useful. No regrets, no loss.

Personally, I think it would be a great day when we sink ALL the warships.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. They sunk the America in 6000 ft of water
No divers are going to enjoy this one.

Besides an aircraft carrier, especially one named USS AMERICA, is a bigger deal and very symbolic at this moment in time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. I second that proposal and then start with all the fighter planes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
30. I was JUST planning a little paint job for that carrier...
They should have changed the name to the "USSA Rumsfeld" before sinking it, NOT scuttling it bearing the name "America!" :mad:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaumont58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
34. Made in America
I've been waiting for someone to point out a wasted opportunity. DOD should have sold the surplus carrier to some enterprising outsourcer who then could have sailed the carrier to say, the Mariana Islands, and converted it into sweatshops. All products that come out of those sweatshops could legitimately say: Made in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC