Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Review May Shift Terror Policies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-05 10:15 PM
Original message
WP: Review May Shift Terror Policies
U.S. Is Expected to Look Beyond Al Qaeda

Sunday, May 29, 2005; A01

The Bush administration has launched a high-level internal review of its efforts to battle international terrorism, aimed at moving away from a policy that has stressed efforts to capture and kill al Qaeda leaders since Sept. 11, 2001, and toward what a senior official called a broader "strategy against violent extremism."

The shift is meant to recognize the transformation of al Qaeda over the past three years into a far more amorphous, diffuse and difficult-to-target organization than the group that struck the United States in 2001. But critics say the policy review comes only after months of delay and lost opportunities while the administration left key counterterrorism jobs unfilled and argued internally over how best to confront the rapid spread of the pro-al Qaeda global Islamic jihad.

President Bush's top adviser on terrorism, Frances Fragos Townsend, said in an interview that the review is needed to take into account the "ripple effect" from years of operations targeting al Qaeda leaders such as Khalid Sheik Mohammed, arrested for planning the Sept. 11 attacks, and his recently detained deputy. "Naturally, the enemy has adapted," she said. "As you capture a Khalid Sheik Mohammed, an Abu Faraj al-Libbi raises up. Nature abhors a vacuum."

The review marks the first ambitious effort since the immediate aftermath of the 2001 attacks to take stock of what the administration has called the "global war on terrorism" -- or GWOT -- but is now considering changing to recognize the evolution of its fight. "What we really want now is a strategic approach to defeat violent extremism," said a senior administration official who described the review on the condition of anonymity because it is not finished. "GWOT is catchy, but there may be a better way to describe it, and those are things that ought to be incumbent on us to look at."

more…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/28/AR2005052801171.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Doesn't matter what they call it, or how they say they'll approach it
They'll screw it up and make everyone around the world even angrier than they are now.

The bush administration is the proverbial stick in the hornets' nest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bush counterterrorism has been counterproductive --
they've clearly worsened the problem, most especially with the Iraq war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Recognize the evolution of its fight?"
Gee, I guess it isn't intelligently designed.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. I can see the ads now
"GWOT Terrorism?" (Got Milk?) :)

This is nothing more than a tacit admission that they CAN'T stop terrorism and never could, and they don't have a freaking single clue how to do it.

Why doesn't Bush just fly over there with his superman cape, walk across the Red Sea and fry them all with his X-Ray vision?

Because he's riding his new bicycle!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. "I'm in charge here" -- Al Haig. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. Does this mean we're
changing horses in mid stream?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-05 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. This part just cracks me up! Do they really think we're that stupid?
President Bush's top adviser on terrorism, Frances Fragos Townsend, said in an interview that the review is needed to take into account the "ripple effect" from years of operations targeting al Qaeda leaders such as Khalid Sheik Mohammed, arrested for planning the Sept. 11 attacks, and his recently detained deputy. "Naturally, the enemy has adapted," she said. "As you capture a Khalid Sheik Mohammed, an Abu Faraj al-Libbi raises up. Nature abhors a vacuum."


So, they're trying to take credit for the way al Qaeda has ALWAYS existed?? They're just now realizing what everyone else has known for YEARS but they're trying to spin it like they're on top of it.


Freakin' hypocrites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC