Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. plans radioactive project

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 07:19 PM
Original message
U.S. plans radioactive project
The Bush administration is planning the government's first production of plutonium 238 - a highly radioactive substance valued as a power source - since the Cold War, stirring debate over the risks and benefits of the deadly material. It is hot enough to melt plastic and so dangerous that a speck can cause cancer.

Federal officials say the program would produce a total of 330 pounds, or 150 kilograms, over 30 years at the Idaho National Laboratory, a sprawling site outside Idaho Falls some 100 miles, or 160 kilometers, to the west and upwind of Grand Teton National Park in Wyoming. The program could cost $1.5 billion and generate more than 50,000 drums of hazardous and radioactive waste.

"The real reason we're starting production is for national security," Timothy Frazier, head of radioisotope power systems at the Department of Energy, said at the end of a recent interview.

He vigorously denied that any of the classified missions would involve nuclear arms, satellites or weapons in space.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/06/26/news/nuke.php



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tives12 Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. i don't get it
I do not see how it can be remotely possible for us to be the world police regarding nuclear material, when we are the worst ones?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. 330 lbs isn't nearly enough for a reactor.
Edited on Sun Jun-26-05 07:37 PM by Massacure
Plutonium-238 cannot even be fizzled in a reactor. That means they must be planning on using a Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (RTG). Usually that means you are generating a little bit of power over a very long time. In this case, you only lose half of your original power every 80 something years.

I'm betting it does have to do with something in space, even if they deny it.

Edit: Plutonium-238 has an ability to generate .54 kilowatts of electricity per kilogram. So this will generate about 81 kilowatts of power. However RTGs are less than 10% efficiency, so we are probably looking in the range of 7-8 kilowatts of power. That is a lot for a space craft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ovidsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Very confusing.
If this P238 can't be used for weapons, and the US claims it won't be used to power satellites, what is it's purpose?

calling all experts...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. The U.S. says a lot of things that aren't true.
PU-238 cannot be fizzled, so that means you cannot power a fission reactor or make an atomic or hydrogen bomb with it. You can use it in an RTG generator to supply power for a really long time. Whatever the government is doing with it, it will be in some remote out of the way place where there is no grid power and no easy way to transport fuel to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. What about space-based lasers ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SouthernDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Not enough juice. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. National SECURITY?
What insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is nuts.
Completely and dangerously insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConfuZed Donating Member (856 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. "It is hot enough to melt plastic"
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. "vigorously deny"
Edited on Sun Jun-26-05 08:30 PM by PATRICK
That is too trite. I want to actually see him throwing his wig on the ground, stomping up and down at it and swearing like St. peter in the garden.

How else will those of us who can never believe these whoppers be impressed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. "It's completely wrapped in the flag...they absolutely won't let on."
This worries me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. "The real reason we're starting production is for national security"
:wtf:

National security?

Security from whom!?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. If they aren't going to use it for nuclear arms
then what the hell do they need plutonium 238 for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. NYT: U.S. Has Plans to Again Make Own Plutonium
The Bush administration is planning the government's first production of plutonium 238 since the cold war, stirring debate over the risks and benefits of the deadly material. The substance, valued as a power source, is so radioactive that a speck can cause cancer.

Federal officials say the program would produce a total of 330 pounds over 30 years at the Idaho National Laboratory, a sprawling site outside Idaho Falls some 100 miles to the west and upwind of Grand Teton National Park in Wyoming. Officials say the program could cost $1.5 billion and generate more than 50,000 drums of hazardous and radioactive waste.

Project managers say that most if not all of the new plutonium is intended for secret missions and they declined to divulge any details. But in the past, it has powered espionage devices.

"The real reason we're starting production is for national security," Timothy A. Frazier, head of radioisotope power systems at the Energy Department, said in a recent interview.

more…
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/27/politics/27nuke.html?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Dupe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Go blow up the world
Guess Dumb Fuck Chimp just no interested in peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Atom bombs don't last forever
Although I think Plutonium 239 is usually used for the core of atomic (or thermo-nuclear) bombs. I have read that the U.S. stock will need updating soon, but this wouldn't make too many bombs even if it was the right stuff. Probably some star wars type use is intended (powering satellites, not necessarily as weaponry per se).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
18. It definitely looks like a space weapon thing (Pu238 was used on the moon)
Here is what Wikopedia says (I don't think the Bushies are interested in heart pacemakers, although Cheney may want his own personal supply):

"The plutonium isotope 238Pu is an alpha emitter with a half-life of 87 years. These characteristics make it well suited for electrical power generation for devices which must function without direct maintenance for timescales approximating a human lifetime. It is therefore used in RTGs such as those powering the Galileo and Cassini space probes; earlier versions of the same technology powered seismic experiments on the Apollo Moon missions.

238Pu has been used successfully to power artificial heart pacemakers, to reduce the risk of repeated surgery. It has been largely replaced by lithium-based batteries recharged by induction, but as of 2003 there were somewhere between 50 and 100 plutonium-powered pacemakers still implanted and functioning in living patients."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
19. US to resume plutonium 238 production-report
NEW YORK (Reuters) - The United States plans to produce highly radioactive plutonium 238 for the first time since the Cold War, The New York Times reported on Monday.

The newspaper quoted project managers as saying most, if not all, of the new plutonium was intended for secret missions. The officials would not disclose details, but the newspaper said the plutonium in the past powered espionage devices.

The Times said Timothy Frazier, head of radioisotope power systems at the U.S. Energy Department, vigorously denied in a recent interview any of the classified missions would involve nuclear arms, satellites or weapons in space.
...
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=578&e=4&u=/nm/20050627/ts_nm/arms_usa_plutonium_dc


Every day is a new hell. And isn't Bechtel going to take over Los Alamos?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Why do they have to produce it? I though it was one of the...
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 01:40 AM by Up2Late
...by products of Nuclear Power generation? (i.e. one of the components of Nuclear waste that could me extracted to recycle the Fuel rods):shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
praxiz Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. It has to be enriched.
Biproducts from a nuclear plant are not highly enriched, so they're probably building a processing plant, which is a COMPLETELY different deal than a nuclear powerplant which just produces electricity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
praxiz Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Oh .. grrrrrrrreat.. that's just .. oh man .. juuuuust greeeaaat...!

Remember when people comment on how stupid people were in the late thirties because they didnt see the signs that Hitler was about to wreck havoc and destruction on the world.

History repeats itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carincross Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. An Environmental Disaster
The plant is to be located just up wind from Yellowstone, the Grand Tetons, and Jackson Hole.

...Even Jesus would never
Forgive what you do
Let me ask you one question
Is your money that good
Will it buy you forgiveness
Do you think that it could
I think you will find
When your death takes its toll
All the money you made
Will never buy back your soul.
The Master of War - Bob Dylan (1963)

It's Deja Vu all over again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Or if shot into space...
...one launchpad boo-boo could contaminate a lot of real estate real fast. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
25. Yahoo has this on the front page with better headline..
be sure to rate it up. Their headline, which is MUCH MORE SINISTER, says that US is restarting plutonium production for SECRET MISSIONS. Now, y'all wanna guess what would happen if any other country were to make that same announcement? We'd be bombing them next week.. I'm officially scared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
26. "They say the production effort is a potential threat to nearby ecosystems
including Yellowstone National Park, Grand Teton National Park and the area around Jackson Hole...."

Link to story:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/27/politics/27nuke.html?ex=1277524800&en=d2a4c8d306596edf&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss


If I were going to begin producing the most poisonous, toxic substance known to man, I don't think I would position it near an active super volcano. When Yellowstone blows, survial of our species will be in doubt. The plutionium may be gone, but there will still be 50,000 barrels of radioactive waste.

Here's a few links on Yellowstone:
http://www.unmuseum.org/supervol.htm
http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/yvo/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/1999/supervolcanoes.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ovidsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
27. A plutonium pellet and a minor slip of the tongs (NYT)
"Tongs in hand, gazing through a safety window, the specialist reached out gingerly to pick up the pellet of plutonium 238, which was hot enough to melt his plastic gloves. He did so in a hidden realm at a highly secure site at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, one of the few places in the world that works with this deadly form of plutonium.

"A labyrinth of checkpoints, guards with guns, intruder alarms, double fences, razor wire, spotlights and guard towers surrounded him and a handful of visitors on a special tour recently, including one reporter who was allowed to enter. Beeping radiation detectors reminded everyone of the health danger.

"Suddenly, he lost his grip."


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/27/national/27alamos.html?

It's enough to make you lose sleep!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC