Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Goldman `Skeptical' of Bush Budget (Bloomberg News)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 02:36 PM
Original message
Goldman `Skeptical' of Bush Budget (Bloomberg News)
July 14 (Bloomberg) -- Economists at Goldman, Sachs & Co.
``remain skeptical'' about a long-term improvement in the U.S.
federal budget deficit, even as tax receipts surge. They disagree
with yesterday's Bush administration forecast for continued
declines in the deficit.
``At least part of the surge in tax receipts has been due to
less sustainable factors, for example the very strong performance
of the equity market over the past two years,'' wrote Andrew
Tilton, an economist at New York-based Goldman Sachs, in a note
to clients yesterday.

(no link - this is from a Bloomberg terminal. Will post a link when one becomes available).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Supporting story
http://futures.fxstreet.com/Futures/news/afx/singleNew.asp?menu=economicnews&pv_noticia=1121294636-e04f0f08-44941

. . .

"t least part of the surge in receipts has been due to less sustainable factors, for example the very strong performance of the equity market over the past two years," wrote Goldman Sachs economist Andrew Tilton, in a research note. "With the S&P 500 up only slightly so far this year, non-withheld income tax gains are likely to be somewhat weaker in 2006." Tilton said he agreed with OMB's 2005 forecast, but was skeptical of the OMB's long-range forecast, partly due to the White House's expectation that two-thirds of the recent revenue rise will be sustained in coming years

The White House's long-term outlook may also prove overly optimistic since it assumes only another $50 billion in spending through 2010 to fund ongoing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, he said. The projections also offer no estimate of the cost of reforming the alternative minimum tax, or AMT

Budget hawks warned the recent improvement in the outlook could induce lawmakers to pursue new spending or tax cuts that could reverse any recent gains on the fiscal front, despite the looming retirement of the Baby Boom generation

"If lawmakers get the idea that our fiscal challenges are behind us and view these numbers as a green light for new tax cuts or spending initiatives, they will make a bad situation worse," said Robert L. Bixby, executive director of The Concord Coalition, a group that advocates balanced budgets

. . . more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks
Used this to undermine a freeper post somewhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You're welcome - since the batshit-crazy WSJ editorial
Edited on Thu Jul-14-05 04:53 PM by swag
calling increased revenues a "vindication of the Laffer curve," the knuckledraggers have been singing hosanna, but the smart money is extremely skeptical, especially given the fiscal incontinence of the borrow-and-spend Republicans in the House, Senate, and White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Four plus years of fiscal disaster
And they call one quarter that isn't as bad as expected a vindication of the model. The freeper I was debating likes to present himself as an expert in economics because he has a bachelor's degree in it. And yet, he won't believe anything Paul Krugman says. We need a term for freeper logic. FreeLogic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That's catchy. You can add the tagline: Logic-free!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh dear, he's losing the wall street ho's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. He lost some of them long ago with his very shitty policies,
Paul McCulley and Steve Roach, to name two very prominent ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC