Contrast what was said to "social conservatives" for the past year, and what Fred Thompson and others are saying now, to a different audience, about Roberts.
New York Times:
A Year of Work to Sell Roberts to Conservatives
By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK
Published: July 22, 2005
WASHINGTON, July 21 - For at least a year before the nomination of Judge John G. Roberts to the Supreme Court, the White House was working behind the scenes to shore up support for him among its social conservative allies, quietly reassuring them that he was a good bet for their side in cases about abortion, same-sex marriage and public support for religion.
When the White House began testing the name of Judge Roberts on a short list of potential nominees, many social conservatives were skeptical. In hearings for confirmation to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, he had called the original abortion rights precedent "the settled law of the land" and said "there is nothing in my personal views that would prevent me from fully and faithfully applying that precedent."...
***
But with a series of personal testimonials about Judge Roberts, his legal work, his Roman Catholic faith, and his wife's public opposition to abortion, two well-connected Christian conservative lawyers - Leonard Leo, chairman of Catholic outreach for the Republican Party, and Jay Sekulow, chief counsel of an evangelical Protestant legal center founded by Pat Robertson - gradually won over most social conservatives to nearly unanimous support, even convincing them that the lack of a paper trail was an asset that made Judge Roberts harder to attack....
***
They made their case by recounting the briefs Judge Roberts had filed as lawyer for Republican administrations, including one arguing against the validity of the abortion rights precedent Roe v. Wade and another in support of allowing religious ceremonies at public school events.
Although Judge Roberts said at his confirmation hearings that his work as a legal advocate did not necessarily reflect his own views, Mr. Sekulow said he knew that Judge Roberts's heart was in it. "He doesn't argue just to argue," Mr. Sekulow said....
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/22/politics/politicsspecial1/22lobby.html