Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT:Timing of Hearings, Vote Stalls Roberts Confirmation Talks (with Dems)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:41 AM
Original message
NYT:Timing of Hearings, Vote Stalls Roberts Confirmation Talks (with Dems)
Edited on Wed Jul-27-05 08:46 AM by DeepModem Mom
Timing of Hearings and Vote Stalls Confirmation Talks
By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK
Published: July 27, 2005


WASHINGTON, July 26 - Senator Arlen Specter, the Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said Tuesday that negotiations with Democrats had stalled over the timing of confirmation hearings and a final vote on nomination of Judge John G. Roberts to the Supreme Court.

Mr. Specter, of Pennsylvania, said that before he would schedule hearings to begin after Labor Day he wanted Democrats to commit to a vote on Judge Roberts on Sept. 29, so that if confirmed he could be seated with the court when it begins its session on Oct. 3. Without such a commitment, he said, the panel is more likely to start hearings on Aug. 29.

Both parties say that agreeing on a vote deadline would bar Democrats from stopping Judge Roberts's nomination with a filibuster, a parliamentary weapon that could allow a minority to put off a vote indefinitely. So far, one week after Judge Roberts was nominated, few expect the Democrats to mount a filibuster. But Democratic strategists say they are not ready to give up the one tactic that could enable them to block confirmation.

"I do not know that it is realistic to get assurances or commitments, because, as you all know, the Senate operates at the will of any single senator," Mr. Specter told reporters. "If we do not have those kinds of assurances, then it may be necessary to go to the Aug. 29 date because there are many unpredictable factors that could arise to delay the proceedings."

Asked about setting a date to vote, Senator Patrick J. Leahy, Democrat of Vermont and the ranking minority member of the Judiciary Committee, said: "Make a decision before we have a hearing? That is an amazing concept."...


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/27/politics/politicsspecial1/27confirm.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. upordown
upordown upordown upordown upordown upordown upordown upordown upordown upordown upordown upordown upordown upordown upordown upordown upordown upordown upordown upordown upordown upordown upordown upordown upordown

:puke:

I'm glad we're not seeing the same ass kissing we saw from the Dems the night he was nominated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC