Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Top Spy's No. 2 Tells of Changes to Avoid Error -NYT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:50 PM
Original message
Top Spy's No. 2 Tells of Changes to Avoid Error -NYT
John D. Negroponte, the new director of national intelligence, has imposed strict safeguards intended to ensure that the government's National Intelligence Estimates are based on credible information instead of the kinds of unsubstantiated claims that were the basis for prewar intelligence on Iraq, his top deputy said Thursday.

The deputy, Gen. Michael V. Hayden, made clear that the change should be seen as a response to the intelligence failures on Iraq, most notably the National Intelligence Estimate of October 2002 that asserted that the Iraqis had chemical and biological weapons and were rebuilding their nuclear program. Those assertions were proved wrong, and a presidential commission said in March that the fault lay in part with failures by the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Central Intelligence Agency and others to validate the reliability of their sources and to share their doubts with others.

General Hayden, testifying before a House Intelligence subcommittee, said the change was intended to give new, critical scrutiny to both human and technical intelligence, including reports from agents, satellite photographs and intercepted communications. Among the focuses, he said, will be "who said what, why, and why do we think this is true?"

National Intelligence Estimates are periodic classified reports, prepared by the intelligence community for the president and other national leaders, that are intended to identify trends of significance to national security. General Hayden acknowledged Thursday that the new precautions were likely to result in estimates that proved much less definitive than in the past. But he said he and Mr. Negroponte would embrace "a higher tolerance for ambiguity" than had been accepted and would encourage analysts to be forthright about what they did not know.

http://nytimes.com/2005/07/29/politics/29intel.html?hp&ex=1122609600&en=8ddf982da2d88a2e&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Don Claybrook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. In other words
The White House made a call to Negroponte and kicked off the re-smearing of the CIA on WMD lies. And if enough people believe it was the CIA that got it wrong, then George can't be responsible for the 16 words in the State of the Union and that helps to clear Karl and Scooter's good names.

Good luck with that, guys.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. It wasn't a lack of standards that caused the twisted intelligence.
The CIA was right all along with their Iraq intelligence, if anything they exaggerated the threat slightly.

What went wrong was a Monkey Idiot Boy at the top saying "I want a war, find me a reason to go to war with Iraq." That was the big goddamn problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC