Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Taser killed man, pathologist finds (Sun-Times)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ovidsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:47 PM
Original message
Taser killed man, pathologist finds (Sun-Times)
Chicago Sun-Times

July 29, 2005

BY FRANK MAIN Crime Reporter

In the first ruling of its kind in the nation, the Cook County medical examiner's office has determined the Feb. 10 death of Ronald Hasse was caused by a Taser stun gun a Chicago Police sergeant used to subdue the doped-up 54-year-old man.

(/snip)

That's extraordinary," Denton said Thursday. "He became unresponsive and died after this."

The primary cause of Hasse's death was electrocution from the use of the Taser, Denton said. A contributing cause was methamphetamine intoxication, he said.


http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-taser29.html

Here's an argument against both tasers and meth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Doped-Up"
That's not to loaded is it. :eyes: Also since the pathologist says the Taser killed the man I guess it doesn't have any real bearing on anything. Why is it there?

Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ovidsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. One = one = death?
Notice that while the coroner says he had a LETHAL dose of meth in his system, it was the taser that got the blame.

Also, the death's been ruled a homicide... but nobody's a suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sounds Like Junk All The Way Around.
Typical CYA and CAB report.

Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. You can't have a lethal dose of meth
Edited on Sat Jul-30-05 10:30 PM by Nevernose
It's a non-OD drug. While technically possible, it's virtually impossible. It can have effects such as hardening of the arteries (leading to stroke or heart attack), but does not directly cause overdose. A far more prevavlent side-effect is amphetamine psychosis, which is inevitable with prolonged use and causes good people to do terrible things.

BTW: I'm all for taser use, when used properly. My problem is that in too many cases they aren't used with good judgement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bribri16 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. When will tasers be outlawed?
If not, why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. As I have said before, there should be extensive...
testing done on Tasers before they are allowed into the open. Ray Samuels, Newark NJ police chief said that Taser-type technology has a place in police work but he'd like to see the truth about it's safety first. Also, he is genuinly concered about abuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Cook County medical examiner relied exclusively upon James Ruggieri's
work regarding the safety threshold for tasers. Ruggieri may be proven correct however Taser International has rebutted his publication, see below.

QUOTE
Analysis Claiming 'TASER™ Danger' Miscalculates Safety Threshold by Factor of 100

Report Applied Incorrect Standard to Evaluate TASER Output

SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. - TASER International, Inc. (Nasdaq: TASR), a market leader in advanced non-lethal devices, today responded to a report presented at the American Academy of Forensic Sciences conference in New Orleans wherein Mr. James Ruggieri presented an erroneous paper claiming that the electrical output of the TASER M26 is above the fibrillation threshold for 50% of the population.

"Mr. Ruggieri made a significant miscalculation, leading him to an insupportable conclusion," noted Max Nerheim, Vice President of Research and Development for TASER International, Inc. "Mr. Ruggieri's assertions are predicated on published safety guidelines in International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 479-1. Unfortunately, the standards published in IEC 479-1 are only applicable to low frequency, continuous duty cycle, AC electrical currents of less than 100 Hz, such as one would experience from an electrical wall outlet and not the output one would receive from a TASER device. Rather, the TASER M26 output is a pulsed, damped sine wave current with a frequency equivalent to 50,000 Hz. High frequency and pulsed outputs are covered under IEC 479-2, which indicates that the fibrillation threshold for currents similar to the TASER M26 are 100 times greater than the standard in IEC 479-1 errantly used by Mr. Ruggieri," continued Mr. Nerheim.

"In fact, there are three separate methodologies within IEC 479-2 which demonstrate the TASER M26 output to be significantly below the IEC fibrillation threshold. The appropriate standards under IEC 479-2 are consistent with data from both animal experiments and over 100,000 human volunteers, including myself and every other senior manager and engineer at TASER International, without a single incident of ventricular fibrillation. This is also backed by the over 66,000 actual field use applications by law enforcement. His misrepresentation was further evidenced by the remarks and questions raised by medical experts in attendance. It is disappointing that Mr. Ruggieri chose not to allow us to provide this technical feedback by reviewing his opinions before presenting them in a public forum."

"Furthermore, I was surprised that Mr. Ruggieri did not notice the error with his results as they are diametrically opposed to the dozens of independent studies of numerous government agencies that have concluded the TASER system, while not risk free, is generally safe. We invite interested readers to download a more in-depth analysis of this topic at http://www.taser.com/savinglives," concluded Mr. Nerheim.
UNQUOTE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Taser doesn't want to acknowledge that more than 100 people have...
...died after being shocked by a taser...bad for business, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geomon666 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. They electrocuted him for almost a minute.
57 seconds. Imagine. Count with me now:

1...2...3...4...5...6...7...8...9...10...etc. And they wonder why he died?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. Surely someone has invoked the Eggshell Skull Doctrine
when someone has died from a Taser by now. Be curious to see how the claim was treated. Only thing I can figure why there haven't been big dollar payouts over it is that they are mostly carried by LEOs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScamUSA.Com Donating Member (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. theres already a 2-3% fatality rate for tasers
Cautionary Information:
The ADVANCED TASER is a less-lethal weapon. It is designed to incapacitate a target from a safe distance without causing death or permanent injury. While the medical evidence strongly supports that the ADVANCED TASER will not cause lasting after effect or fatality, it is important to remember that the very nature of physical confrontation involves a degree of risk that someone will get hurt or may even be killed due to unforeseen circumstances and individual susceptibilities. Accordingly, the ADVANCED TASER should be treated as a serious weapon and should only be deployed in situations where the alternative would be to use other force measures which carry similar or higher degrees of risk
NEVER POINT THE ADVANCED TASER® AT ANOTHER PERSON UNLESS INTENDING TO USE. NEVER AIM THE ADVANCED TASER AT THE EYES OR FACE. KEEP THE ADVANCED TASER OUT OF THE REACH OF CHILDREN. ALWAYS REPLACE LOW BATTERIES. IN ORDER TO EXTEND THE WEAPON LIFE, AVOID DROPPING UNIT. KEEP HANDS AWAY FROM THE FRONT OF THE UNIT AT ALL TIMES UNLESS THE SAFETY SLIDE IS FORWARD AND THE ADVANCED TASER IS DEACTIVATED. NEVER TILT THE ADVANCED TASER WHEN FIRING (unless you are firing at a target laying on his side). IF GOING ON AN AIRPLANE, YOU MUST PUT THE ADVANCED TASER IN YOUR CHECKED LUGGAGE, IT CANNOT BE CARRIED ON BOARD. ALWAYS REPLACE AIR CARTRIDGES BY THE EXPIRATION DATE PRINTED ON EACH AIR CARTRIDGE. DO NOT FIRE THE ADVANCED TASER NEAR FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS AND FUMES. THE ADVANCED TASER CAN IGNITE GASOLINE OR OTHER FLAMMABLES. SOME SELF-DEFENSE SPRAYS ARE FLAMMABLE AND WOULD BE EXTREMELY DANGEROUS TO USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH ADVANCED TASER. THE ADVANCED TASER CAUSES TEMPORARY PARALYSIS. THIS PARALYSIS CAN BE DANGEROUS AND EVEN FATAL UNDER SPECIFIC CIRCUMSTANCES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC