Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Governor's redistricting map gamble may pay off

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 11:30 AM
Original message
Governor's redistricting map gamble may pay off
snip>
...Republicans led by U.S. Majority Leader Tom DeLay rolled the dice for everything. Their map is designed to defeat seven Anglo incumbent Democrats. They did it by packing some black and Hispanic voters into minority districts and dispersing others among solid and safe Republican districts.

In widely circulated e-mail last week, a top aide for Republican Congressman Joe Barton of Ennis blurted out his view that the redistricting proposal was "the most aggressive map" he's ever seen.

If it holds up in court, the plan would yield a political bonanza for Republicans. Perry could become a darling of the national GOP. The partisan balance of the U.S. House of Representatives hangs on a perilously close swing of just 12 seats out of 435. Most congressional elections are not competitive. No more than 30 seats are usually in play during any election cycle.

For Republicans to pick up five to seven seats without an election would be huge. National Republicans would owe Perry more than a pat on the back for his persistence in pushing redistricting.

On the other hand, the redistricting plan comes with a number of constitutional and Voting Rights Act questions. Three lawsuits already were filed this week, and more will follow. The U.S. Supreme Court has already approved the current congressional districts, under which last year's election was conducted.

http://www.borderlandnews.com/stories/borderland/20031018-34269.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Brucey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think they're going to get away with another one.
There are several Democratic reps in TX who will likely lose now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Zanti Regent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I'm sure the hand-picked Federalist Society Judge will approve it
and the Whore Press will remain totally silent...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. I guess Texans don't mind being hog-swaggled by these guys
but I hardly can criticize...I live in California...

We've been Arnoldized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jazzgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Oh yes we do mind being hog-swaggled!
At least some of us do...me in particular. I know many people were against the redistricting move here, many of them staunch repubs. Most of the people I know realize the move was strictly driven by Rove and the WH. They resent it too but I can't say how it'll play out in the next election. I do know who I'm NOT voting for!

Jazzgirl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pfitz59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. The map I saw looked like an octopus!
With scraggly tentacles stretching for literally hundreds of miles! Talk about gerrymandering!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nancy Waterman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. They purposely sought to be rid of all white representation
Can't that be seen as against the law in some way? It is on record that they specifically wanted only minority representation and have worked to exclude whites. Surely that comes under some law? Any legal scholars here who know the answer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. In the midst of one of the Dem bolts
there was an article quoting Grover "bipartisanship-is-like-date-rape" Norquist. He held up a picture of Sheila Jackson Lee and said something to the effect of "we need to be sure that everyone knows this is the face of the Democratic party".

This is a whole new Southern Strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. We Lose the Seats Without an Election?
How does that happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJerseyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Court precedent is against us
http://www.naacpldf.org/legalprogram/easley-v-cromartie.html

In this decision, the Court further clarifies and reinforces its prior holdings that it is not unconstitutional for states to be conscious of race during the redistricting process and specifically identifies the kind of evidence most probative in determining whether a particular redistricting decision is best explained by politics or race. In addition to the Court's assurance in prior rulings that jurisdictions have a compelling justification for complying with the strictures of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, this decision now clearly indicates that if a jurisdiction draws district lines to fulfill partisan political objectives, the fact that a large number of residents of the district are also members of a racial minority group does not, in and of itself, render the district a "racial gerrymander."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. For Republicans to pick up five to seven seats without an election
is undemocratic.

Gov. Goodhair needs to be recalled...meanwhile, state college tuition goes up as much as 600%!!!

Recall the bastard!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJerseyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Huh???
I don't think that there can be recalls in Texas.

There will be an election in 2004. If the people of Texas really wanted to they could keep the democrats in office.

I think this is clearly wrong and there shouldn't be redistricting in the middle of the decade, but to say that there won't be an election is just ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Satan Donating Member (183 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. this guy sounds like a pioneer
I mean whoever heard of actually fighting for a political belief?
Damn, I thought just being nice and appeasing your enemies would bring a goldmine of results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC