Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Early warnings raised doubt on Bush disaster plans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 04:13 PM
Original message
Early warnings raised doubt on Bush disaster plans
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N17208748.htm

Early warnings raised doubt on Bush disaster plans
17 Sep 2005 20:16:03 GMT
Source: Reuters

By Adam Entous

WASHINGTON, Sept 17 (Reuters) - In the months before Hurricane
Katrina, President George W. Bush sought to cut a key program to help
local governments raise their preparedness, and state officials
warned of a "total lack of focus" on natural disasters by his
homeland-security chief, documents show.

The disclosures add to questions over the administration's
emergency-response planning, Homeland Security Secretary Michael
Chertoff's priorities and the way the White House budgets for
disaster preparedness after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

Organizations representing emergency-response and security officials
at state and local agencies had complained of funding shortages and
what they saw as an excessive shift by the Homeland Security
Department away from preparing for natural disasters, as it focused
increasingly on terrorism.

In July, the National Emergency Management Association wrote lawmakers
expressing "grave" concern that still-pending changes proposed by
Chertoff would undercut the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA).
<snip>

more...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. No question, Chertoff's head is going to roll - but it's really Bush too
This memo is another smoking gun on Chertoff - note the date when he FINALLY declared Katrina an "incident" and went about taking some steps. And the meeting with Bush is for yet another day later!

http://www.realcities.com/multimedia/nationalchannel/news/KRT_Packages/archive/katrina/memo_to_cabinet_members.pdf
Read it closely - look at the date when Chertoff FINALLY declares the Katrina destruction an "incident" and BEGINS planning. Note that he will meet with Bush THE NEXT DAY.

Related articles:
KR | 09/13 Chertoff delayed federal response, memo shows
http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/12637172.htm

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4777642
thread title: KR Report: 'Confused' Chertoff Delayed Federal Katrina Response

Recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. It is daming information but will anything come of it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
despairing optimist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Am I a bore when I keep chanting Another Impeachable Offense?
Add this to the pile. Together they could have plugged the breach in the 17th Street Canal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's not that you're a bore, it's just that it apparently doesn't matter
Edited on Sat Sep-17-05 06:12 PM by Hissyspit
what he does.

Clinton impeached over basically nothing, with polls showing the country didn't want it to happen.

Bush worst president ever now most unpopular for all intents and purposes killing Americans left and right with offense after offense will not be impeached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
despairing optimist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I won't concede that Bush won't be impeached. Chinks in the armor
forced him to sacrifice Brownie and admit he's responsible in the very dysfunctional way he did. Rove, Cheney, and DeLay are in various degrees of trouble. Congressional Republicans balked at the more regressive "reforms" of the Bushistas and fear defeat next year because of Iraq and Katrina. And the MSM has turned more skeptical--not all of it but enough to make a difference.

In 1973 Richard Nixon looked invincible even with his own administration's armor showing gaps, and he had scored one of the biggest electoral landslides in US history just the year before the Senate Watergate hearings were held. My point is, these guys are not as omnipotent as they'd like you to think they are. Don't fall for their spin. And they're certainly not as smart as they think they are, either. Appointing Rove as overseer of the new New Orleans was a monumentally stupid move that Bush will regret, and Thursday's Haunted House speech in a city devoid of people pleased no one but its stage managers.

The best way to counter these types is to act as they do: don't give them any ground. If you have to step back, make it look as if you're stepping forward. Bush is running out of room to retreat into. The GOP will have to shake him off just as it had to shake off Nixon. The difference may be that Bush will have to go all the way, with a Senate conviction, and that, though painful for the country, will haunt the Republicans for at least a generation. Bush will make Herbert Hoover look like Mother Teresa. Wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I will be in Washington next weekend hoping for the best.
I was wearing my pessimism on my sleeve, but I hope that you are correct and you have provided a very good analysis and perspective. (You should post it as a separate thread.) I hope that Fitzgerald will find a 'smoking gun,' and the horrible response to Karina adds to the pressure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
despairing optimist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Me too. See you in DC.
It's time to make a stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. wonder if Donna B. read this? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. the media seems to left Chertoff alone now that Brown is gone. I hear
very little, it any of this on TV news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Does * TRY for disasters? Gives him power. Allows him2 bankrupt treasury.
Allows him to funnel funds to his contributors via pork.

Of one thing I am certain - from 9/11 to Katrina, this administration is the most disastrous in American History.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verminator Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
12. Oct 04: FEMA knew hurricane could flood New Orleans.
OCTOBER 2004:
http://www3.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0410/feature5/

....Thousands drowned in the murky brew that was soon contaminated by sewage and industrial waste. Thousands more who survived the flood later perished from dehydration and disease as they waited to be rescued. It took two months to pump the city dry, and by then the Big Easy was buried under a blanket of putrid sediment, a million people were homeless, and 50,000 were dead. It was the worst natural disaster in the history of the United States.

When did this calamity happen? It hasn't—yet. But the doomsday scenario is not far-fetched. The Federal Emergency Management Agency lists a hurricane strike on New Orleans as one of the most dire threats to the nation, up there with a large earthquake in California or a terrorist attack on New York City.......

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC